Search for: "R. (R.) VS. R. (R.), ET AL." Results 281 - 300 of 520
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jul 2011, 4:49 pm
Kathleen Sebelius, et al. ruled that CMS acted within its authority when it withheld from the West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources, Bureau of Medical Services, West Virginia'a Medicaid Program (DHHR) approximately $634,000 (which was reduced to approximately $446,000)in Medicaid funding, which represented it share of overpayment made to providers as a result of Dey, Inc., a pharmaceutical company, alleged fraud. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 2:07 pm by Justin Tenuto
WikiLeaks’ antitrust claim against Mastercard et al. is much different. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 1:29 am by Marie Louise
GE Healthcare, Ltd., et. al (Docket Report) District Court N D Texas: Judge Solis compares false marking to ‘someone who says, ‘I am not married,’ when indeed, they are’: United States of America, ex rel. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 4:41 pm
In a staggering decision, the US Supreme Court ruled this week in the case of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. vs Dukes, et al., that a class action on behalf of approximately 1.5 million current and former female employees of Walmart could not move forward under the class certification rules set forth under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 4:14 pm
Blackstone et al for breach of fiduciary duty & illegal div in June 07 LBO. http://t.co/o5LiXDq Extended Stay Trustee's 107 pg complaint vs. sellers, buyer, lenders & advisors for avoidable transfers in June 07 LBO. http://t.co/b1AR48Q Good Weil Bankruptcy Blog analysis (http://t.co/rcR2gbG) of SDNY reversal of the Quigley case 524(g) injunction (tweet@ http://t.co/d8AxeDh) BK-CA: Claim obj. under §502(d), w/out seeking recovery of… [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 8:24 pm by Peter Conti-Brown
These factors may point in different directions, but that's just the point: comparing capital requirements between two fundamentally different eras isn't sound social science, and is something of a non-sequitur to the Admati et al arguments. [read post]