Search for: "R. B"
Results 281 - 300
of 55,750
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2024, 11:25 am
Elemer R. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 8:56 pm
These include (i) the treatment of foreign summary enforcement judgments as ordinary “enforceable titles” (sanadat tanfidhiyya – titres exécutoires) under domestic law including domestic judgments rendered in criminal matters; (ii) the assimilation between summary judgment in common law jurisdictions and hukm musta’jil (“summary interlocutory proceedings order” – “jugement en référé”); and (iii) the… [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 6:31 am
Posted by Arthur B. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 6:31 am
Posted by Arthur B. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 3:38 pm
They're anticipated to ask for attorney's fees of $6 billion -- that's billion, with a b.) [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 4:31 pm
Krishnakumar (92 George Washington Law Review) The Unenumerated Power by Caitlin B. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 12:43 pm
Comm’r, T.C. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 11:04 am
Representatives Jim McGovern (D-MA) and Michael McCaul (R-TX) and Senators Jeff Merkley (D-OR) and Todd Young (R-IN) to enhance U.S. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 10:29 am
The R&R states that even on a liberal reading of the RFA, Dr. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 1:48 pm
R. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 1:06 pm
For this past month, the three most-consulted English-language decisions were: R. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 1:45 am
» Básicamente el modelo giraba en azuzar judicialmente a la Administración para actuar cuando existiere una fuente jurídica clara de obligación (disposición directa, o acto administrativo) y que la obligación fuese determinada respecto de personas también determinadas. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 3:56 pm
Judge Richard R. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 10:21 am
Mike DeWine (R) issued an executive order reclassifying nine synthetic opioids as Schedule I drugs, effectively banning them in the state. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 5:59 am
(§54.01(r), (h), F.C.) [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 5:59 am
(§54.01(r), (h), F.C.) [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 5:59 am
(§54.01(r), (h), F.C.) [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 1:42 am
First, the Court addressed the second plea, alleging infringement of Article 51(1)(b) of Regulation No 40/94. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 11:28 am
However, the Federal Circuit disagreed, reasoning that “[r]equiring a terminal to take responsive action differs meaningfully from requiring either the terminal or the portable device to take responsive action. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 11:22 am
Morris, Detective B. [read post]
