Search for: "Res-Care, Inc. v. United States"
Results 281 - 300
of 1,136
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2018, 9:50 am
Henry v. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 6:41 am
Michael Doyle of McClatchy Newspapers tells the “long-shot” story of United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 1:36 pm
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
9 May 2017, 7:30 am
The “presumption of regularity” that attaches to all federal officials’ actions, United States v. [read post]
30 May 2018, 4:36 am
• Policy considerations and implications in United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 5:59 am
[v] The court also considered Delaware’s strong interest in providing a forum for disputes regarding the internal affairs of LLCs formed under its laws. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 5:42 pm
Leslie, et al. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 12:48 am
United States, 17 F.3d 890, 901 (6th Cir. 1994); Albrecht v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 9:17 pm
See Solvay S.A. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 7:00 am
Medtronic, Inc. v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 10:45 am
Kim, that under United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 2:00 pm
Marvel Enterprises, Inc. 13-720Issue: Whether this Court should overrule Brulotte v. [read post]
24 Dec 2015, 8:20 am
This is the first time that any decision from outside the United States has ever appeared on our year-end best/worst lists. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm
Clinton re-nominated Garland in January 1997, and he was confirmed approximately three months later by a vote of 76-23. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 4:35 am
Overstock.com, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 10:40 am
Confederación Hípica de Puerto Rico, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 6:27 pm
HOSPITAL SETTLE FRAUD CASE FOR $3 MILLION, United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:32 am
Hetronic International Inc., the Supreme Court held that the Lanham Act does not reach trademark infringement that occurs outside of the United States (US). [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 7:54 am
§105, as a “work of the United States Government”? [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 4:04 pm
(Reexamination Alert) District Court M D Tennessee: Defendants’ allegation of fraud is one reason to deny motion to stay pending re-examination: Protective Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
