Search for: "Rick Hasen"
Results 281 - 300
of 1,164
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2017, 7:31 am
Briefly: At the Election Law Blog, Rick Hasen reports that a federal district court in Texas has reaffirmed its 2014 finding that the state’s voter-ID law has a discriminatory purpose, despite changes made in the interim; Hasen predicts that “ultimately this case is heading to the Supreme Court” and that its reception depends on how Justice Anthony Kennedy (assuming that he is still on the court) will view the evidence of intentional discrimination. [read post]
23 Aug 2017, 4:09 am
UC/Irvine lawprof Rick Hasen yearns for those days. [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 7:08 am
In an op-ed in the Los Angeles Times, Rick Hasen argues that “cheap speech, despite its undeniable benefits, has come with a steep price for our democracy,” and “a new conservative Supreme Court is more likely to make things worse than better. [read post]
16 Jul 2017, 4:58 am
Lawprof Rick Hasen has been focused on election law long enough to know. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 10:18 am
Thanks to Jeffrey Redfern for first pointing me to Rick Hasen’s posts. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 8:06 am
I have a guest post at Rick Hasen's Election Law Blog. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 4:15 am
” At the Election Law Blog, Rick Hasen notes that a Kennedy retirement at the end of next term would allow the justice “to go out on a high note, deciding the fate of partisan gerrymandering, gay rights, and who knows what else. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 1:00 pm
But Professor Rick Hasen says it won't work, and I'm going to trust him because I do not want to get pissed off about a whole new thing this close to a long weekend. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 3:56 pm
[Empirical SCOTUS] * Professor Rick Hasen has made up his mind on this: "Gorsuch is the new Scalia, just as Trump promised. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 3:59 am
” Commentary comes from Rick Hasen in an op-ed for The Los Angeles Times and Noah Feldman at Bloomberg View. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 4:22 am
Coverage of Justice Neil Gorsuch’s debut this term comes from Lawrence Hurley and Andrew Chung at Reuters and from Ariane de Vogue at CNN, while commentary comes from Oliver Roeder and Harry Enten at FiveThirtyEight, Ashley Dejean at Mother Jones, Scott Lemieux at Democracy, Mark Joseph Stern at Slate, and Rick Hasen at the Election Law Blog. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 4:45 pm
[Lowering the Bar] * A deep look at the gerrymandering case, with Professor Rick Hasen. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 4:29 am
At the Election Law Blog, Rick Hasen observes that the “stay order raises a big question mark for those who think Court will use the case to rein in partisan gerrymandering. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 4:22 am
’” At the Election Law Blog, Rick Hasen observes that the court may decide as early as today not only whether to grant review in Gill v. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 4:38 am
” Briefly: At the Election Law Blog, Rick Hasen notes that yesterday the court without comment denied a motion to have the mandate issued immediately in North Carolina v. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 4:31 am
” Briefly: At the Election Law Blog, Rick Hasen offers an abstract of a forthcoming article that discusses the court’s recent racial-gerrymandering decisions, noting that, given “the malleability of Supreme Court constitutional doctrine, especially in the area of election law,” “it would not be surprising to see a new, more conservative Supreme Court revert to its original treatment of the gerrymandering claim as a tool to limit minority voting power. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 3:57 am
At the Election Law Blog, Rick Hasen observes that “the balancing test that the Court puts forward for when a special election should be held makes great sense, and will extend beyond the racial gerrymandering cases. [read post]
23 May 2017, 3:15 am
” At the Election Law Blog, Rick Hasen suggests that the ruling may indicate that “the Court has really no appetite to get back into this area right now—perhaps they want to save their capital in ruling on other high profile cases coming down the line. [read post]
22 May 2017, 9:26 pm
"Disagreeing With Rick Hasen on the North Carolina Case": Richard Pildes has this post at the "Election Law Blog. [read post]
22 May 2017, 11:36 am
" And at his "Election Law Blog," Rick Hasen has a post titled "Supreme Court on 5-3 Vote Affirms NC Racial Gerrymandering Case, with Thomas in Majority and Roberts in Dissent. [read post]
