Search for: "Robert A. Epstein" Results 281 - 300 of 797
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2008, 3:54 pm
For more on preemption, see Greve and Epstein, POL March 2006, and POL on last week's cert grants in preemption cases. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 7:36 am by Erin Miller
The Scholars Panel includes: Walter Dellinger, Partner, O’Melveny & Myers, and former Acting Solicitor General of the United States Richard Epstein, Laurence A. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 2:45 am by Walter Olson
More: Shapiro and Jayme Weber, The Federalist; Richard Epstein, Robert Alt first, second (empirical evidence that unions can do well even when nonmembers not obliged to pay agency fees), third (stare decisis) posts, George Will. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 7:05 am by Robert Epstein
By Robert Epstein In Texas custody cases, the best interests of the child are the primary consideration, and the court uses broad discretion in determining them. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 7:20 am by Robert Epstein
By Robert Epstein As COVID-19 (Coronavirus) becomes more and more ingrained as a daily part of our news cycle, its ability to affect our day-to-day lives continues. [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 10:01 am
Among the brief’s 27 signatories: former SEC chairs Roderick Hills (pictured), Harvey Pitt and Harold Williams; former SEC commissioner and current Stanford professor Joe Grundfest, former commissioner Laura Unger; and big-wig professors Richard Epstein, Robert Clark and Stephen Bainbridge. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 6:48 am by Joshua R. Goodbaum
The post SCOUTUS Ruling on Standard of Proof in Certain Race Discrimination Claims Will Have Limited Impact in Connecticut appeared first on Garrison, Levin-Epstein, Fitzgerald & Pirrotti, P.C.. [read post]
29 Dec 2006, 1:11 am
Dec 28, 2006) (NO. 10008, 2222/84)Steven Banks, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Susan Epstein of counsel), for appellant. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 12:01 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
Those disappointed by the Supreme Court's decision in the ACA cases have searched for a silver lining in an otherwise devastating defeat: five justices would prohibit the Commerce power from reaching inaction, a Machiavellian CJ Roberts took the long view, that this is the Chief's Marbury v. [read post]