Search for: "Robert Merrick" Results 281 - 300 of 469
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Feb 2017, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
Additional coverage of Sotomayor’s dissent comes from Robert Barnes in The Washington Post. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Democrats who believe—rightly in my view—that the Republican-controlled Senate acted without justification by denying Judge Merrick Garland a hearing despite the fact that he was nominated almost a year before the end of President Obama’s second term may choose to filibuster the Gorsuch nomination on the ground that this seat was effectively stolen.In addition, although no reasonable person doubts that Judge Gorsuch has excellent professional credentials (as does Judge… [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 1:08 pm by Michael Gerhardt
They can hold hearings and vote against the nomination, as the Senate did when it rejected President Ronald Reagan’s nomination of Judge Robert Bork to the Supreme Court in 1987. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 5:22 am by Walter Olson
Take Merrick Garland and John Roberts, two appointees to the U.S. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 5:43 am by Mark Walsh
If this event were scheduled for daylight hours, it could have been held in the Rose Garden, as Tuesday’s temperatures weren’t much cooler than the day last March when President Obama announced Merrick Garland as his pick to fill the seat left vacant by the February 13 death of Justice Antonin Scalia. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 5:57 am by Staci Zaretsky
Sentencing Commission] * President-elect Trump has chosen Skadden Arps partner Robert Lighthizer as U.S. trade representative. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 4:21 am by Edith Roberts
” In a Bloomberg View column, Noah Feldman argues that the Senate’s refusal to consider the nomination of Chief Judge Merrick Garland to the Supreme Court has created “a new norm” in which the “Senate will confirm Supreme Court appointees only if the president and the Senate majority are of the same party. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 5:59 am by Staci Zaretsky
[The Hill] * Sorry, but Chief Justice John Roberts won't grant your emergency petition to force the Senate hold a confirmation vote on President Obama's SCOTUS pick, Judge Merrick Garland (D.C. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 3:25 am by Edith Roberts
At his eponymous blog, Lyle Denniston reports that a New Mexico lawyer’s effort to compel the Senate to vote on the nomination of Chief Judge Merrick Garland to the Supreme Court “may have reached its final point on Monday morning” when Chief Justice John Roberts denied an emergency request for an injunction; Roberts “acted without giving any reason, without sharing the issue with his colleagues, and even without seeking a response from… [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 11:01 am by Tom Smith
Chief Justice John Roberts on Monday rejected a New Mexico lawyer's long-shot bid to force a Senate confirmation vote on President Barack Obama's Supreme Court pick, Merrick Garland, after Republican senators refused to act on his nomination. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 10:38 am
"Roberts denies plea to force Senate action on Garland": The Associated Press has this report. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 7:25 am by Lovechilde
Republicans invariably attempt to excuse their obstruction on judicial appointments by claiming that the Democrats started it when President Reagan nominated Robert Bork to the Supreme Court thirty years ago. [read post]