Search for: "Robert Ross" Results 281 - 300 of 1,241
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jul 2019, 3:56 pm by Amy Howe
Ross’ announcement was instantly the subject of several court challenges, including one in a federal district court in New York. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 12:57 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Roberts is a hip-hop artist known as Rick Ross (who also, incidentally (?) [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 7:48 am by Steve Lubet
Woodruff Professor of Law, Emory University School of Law Harold Pollack, Helen Ross Professor, University of Chicago School of Social Service Administration Lucas A. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 5:30 am by Guest Blogger
”  In his year-later census decision, Roberts reiterated a similarly deferential perspective, in holding – along with the rest of the conservative bloc – that inserting the citizenship question was within the Department’s statutory authority, and that Secretary Ross’ rejection of contrary recommendations by the Census Bureau was not arbitrary and capricious under the Administrative Procedure Act. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm by Samuel Estreicher
Comprised of Chief Justice Roberts and four dissenting justices who voted to sustain Secretary Ross’s decision as not arbitrary or capricious, the Court had to do something more; it could not limit itself to arbitrary/capricious review. [read post]
7 Jul 2019, 7:48 pm by Marty Lederman
"  "Our review is deferential," wrote Chief Justice Roberts, "but we are 'not required to exhibit a naiveté from which ordinary citizens are free.'" (quoting Judge Henry Friendly). [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 9:23 pm by Joseph Fishkin
The only downside is that these reasons are, to their core, some combination of partisan and racial in their intent.But will a court—ultimately, will Chief Justice John Roberts—agree with that? [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
‘The Enigma of the Entire Mueller Probe’: Focus on origins of Russian investigation puts spotlight on Maltese professor MSN – Rosalind Helderman, Shane Harris, and Ellen Nakashima (Washington Post) | Published: 6/30/2019 A conversation between Maltese-born academic Joseph Mifsud and Trump campaign aide George Papadopoulos, eventually relayed by an Australian diplomat to U.S. government officials, was cited by special counsel Robert Mueller as the event that set in… [read post]
4 Jul 2019, 4:01 am by SHG
His argument relies on the mandatory “shall” even though his excuse is no less full of, ahem, falseness than Wilbur Ross’. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 3:23 pm by Amy Howe
The “evidence,” Chief Justice John Roberts wrote, “tells a story that does not match the explanation that” Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross provided. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 1:38 pm by Ken Klukowski
” Thomas noted that Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross carried his burden of explaining a reasoned decision. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 10:08 am by Kaylan Phillips
A first read of Chief Justice John Roberts’ opinion for the court sounds like a slam-dunk win for the government. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 9:54 am by Jennifer Nou
Roberts makes clear that Ross would have been justified in adding the citizenship question had the trial proceedings suggested otherwise. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 8:59 am by Forrest G. Read IV
., the Court, in a 5-4 decision written by Chief Justice Roberts, said the question could not be in the census because the “sole reason” Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross gave for his decision to include it – enforcement of the Voting Rights Act – seemed contrived. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 8:42 am by Tom Smith
On Thursday, Roberts stunned many court watchers by invalidating a Trump administration decision to add a question on citizenship to the 2020 census. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 6:07 am by Chris Hajec
For his part, Chief Justice John Roberts, citing similar reasons, has based rulings in prior cases on the importance of protecting the president’s control over his subordinates. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 4:21 am by Edith Roberts
David Savage reports for the Los Angeles Times that “Roberts, who had the deciding vote, wrote that the law would have allowed the administration to move ahead if it had provided a straightforward justification. [read post]