Search for: "Robert S. Crawford" Results 281 - 300 of 628
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2011, 4:33 am by Daithí
And finally, some new books: Garry Crawford, Video Gamers. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 3:43 am by Russ Bensing
  Kennedy’s status as the swing justice is confirmed by the fact that he voted with the majority 88% of the time, the most on the Court; Roberts was second at 83%, and the three other conservative justices voted with the majority three-quarters of the time. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 7:58 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) on August 19, 2011 released the following: “Jacksonville Man Indicted on Federal Child Pornography Charges JACKSONVILLE, FL— United States Attorney Robert E. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 6:00 am by Kedar
An asterisk beside the case name means that the traitorous Justice added insult to injury by also writing the opinion for the Court. 6-3 Betrayals Justice Betrayals (OT06-present) Per Term Cases Roberts 3 0.60 Roper (OT06), Yeager (08), Graham (09), Scalia - 0.00 - Thomas 1 0.20 Wyeth (08) Ginsburg 2 0.40 Ysura (08), Renico (09) Breyer 11 2.20 Rodriquez (07), Engquist (07), Winter (08), Hedgpeth (08), Waddington (08), Carcieri (08), Entergy (08), Shinseki* (08), Coeur Alaska… [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 3:38 pm by jason
Washington State Trooper Robert Bohling says the children’s injuries were not life-threatening, but all eight of the people involved in this accident were sent to the hospital. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 4:08 pm by Viking
Here is the abstract: In Crawford v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 11:26 pm by Richard D. Friedman
Goldstein, 6 N.Y.3d 119, 843 N.E.2d 727, 810 N.Y.S.2d 100 (by a former boss of mine, Judge Robert Smith), I have emphasized the simple point that if a statement supports the expert’s opinion only if it is true then it is a sham to say that it is being presented to support the opinion but not for its truth; see also The Not-for-the-Truth End Run. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 5:12 pm by Richard D. Friedman
For the first time in a substantive Confrontation Clause opinion in the Crawford era (I’m not counting Whorton v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:49 am by Russ Bensing
  Another interesting aspect of the case is that Kennedy’s dissenting opinion, joined in by Roberts, Alito, and Breyer, directs it fire not only at the result in Bullcoming, but at the entire theory of Crawford, and especially its rejection of reliability as a factor in deciding whether an out-of-court statement should be admitted. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 9:28 am by Kent Scheidegger
  The dissent is by Justice Kennedy joined by Chief Justice Roberts, and Justices Breyer and Alito. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 8:29 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Bowman, 31, of Bowie, Md.; Robert Carl Richards, 35, of Seat Pleasant, Md., and Willie Moorer, 37, of Washington, D.C. [read post]