Search for: "Roberts v. Adams" Results 281 - 300 of 1,795
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2014, 8:02 am by Adam Gershowitz
Adam Gershowitz is a a Professor of Law at William and Mary Law School. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
” At NPR, Nina Totenberg notes that court-watchers are engaging in “a lot of speculation about the motives of” Chief Justice John Roberts in the wake of Roberts’ opinions in the census and partisan-gerrymandering cases. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 11:33 am
Foster, Respecting regulatory measures: Arbitral method and reasoning in the Philip Morris v Uruguay tobacco plain packaging case Fernando Dias Simões, Blusun S.A. and others v Italy: Legal (in)stability and renewable energy investments [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 12:40 pm
Roberts ran for re-election against Jim Adams, and the plaintiffs were lukewarm in their support of Roberts. [read post]
23 May 2016, 1:29 pm by Molly Runkle
The Court also ruled today in Wittman v. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 7:38 am by James Romoser
Adams, a First Amendment case about whether Delaware can choose its state judges based on party affiliation, and Texas v. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 5:44 am by Nabiha Syed
Briefly: Adam Liptak of the New York Times previews one of next Term’s cases, M.B.Z. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 9:43 am
(Denver Post, Feb. 25) From the decision (Medtronic Navigation, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 4:16 am by Edith Roberts
At Take Care (cross-posted at The George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket blog), Robert Tuttle and Ira Lupu weigh in on Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
24 Jan 2015, 7:47 am by SHG
The video of oral argument before the 9th Circuit in Baca v. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 7:41 am by John Floyd
  In three subsequent post-Crawford decisions, the Supreme Court under Chief Justice Roberts attempted to clarify the difference:   Melendez-Dias v. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 4:08 am by Edith Roberts
” At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman examines data related to the Supreme Court’s overruling of its own precedents. [read post]