Search for: "Rock v. State Bar"
Results 281 - 300
of 629
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm
TM bar and PTO: this isn’t an incredibly diverse bar, any more than this panel is. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the case of Lee v. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm
According to an official Minnesota State Bar Association publication, Gruender “knocked his father to the floor before his 12-year-old brother could be shot. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 4:27 am
” In Supreme Court Brief (subscription required), Tony Mauro reports on how “a frustrated entry” on a “popular trademark blog about an Asian-American rock band, The Slants, that was fighting to have its name accepted as a registered trademark” led to Lee v. [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 10:59 am
"), United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 10:43 am
As the court stated in 1995, in Rosenberger v. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 7:51 am
Similarly, in United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 8:54 am
When creating new legislative maps, some states say that they feel stuck between a rock and a hard place. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 11:54 am
The United States Supreme Court ruled in Clinton v. [read post]
27 Nov 2016, 4:06 pm
United States Ryan Larson, the man c [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 11:41 am
IMatthew David Brozik blogged here about Tiffany v. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 6:34 am
Electrology Laboratory, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 10:42 am
Courts of Appeals Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/cta/2016cta.htmlStanding Rock Sioux Tribe v. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 2:20 pm
Courts of Appeals Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/cta/2016cta.html Standing Rock Sioux Tribe v. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 3:08 am
The United States Patent and Trademark Office denied the Slants’ trademark registration under Section 2(a) of the Lanham Act, barring disparaging trademark registrations. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 8:14 am
Tam brings the world of rock music to the often quiet court. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 5:07 am
” At Crime and Consequences, Kent Schiedegger responds to Akil Amar’s recent commentary on the exclusionary rule in this blog’s symposium on the Court after Scalia, contending that last Term’s decision in Utah v. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 4:45 am
Federal Trial Courts Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/dct/2016dct.htmlStanding Rock Sioux Tribe v. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 3:05 pm
Federal Trial Courts Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/dct/2016dct.htmlStanding Rock Sioux Tribe v. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 4:11 pm
Legal defense bars have reported significant increases in litigation of this type. [read post]
