Search for: "Rodriguez v State of New York"
Results 281 - 300
of 376
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Sep 2010, 8:28 am
Under New York’s Mitchell standard, viewed through Brigham City, the People showed sufficient emergency to justify the entry. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 4:33 am
New York City Fire Department Emergency Medical Technician terminated after testing positive for cocaine NYC Fire Department v Rivera, OATH Index #3416/09OATH Administrative Law Judge Julio Rodriguez recommended termination of Carlos Rivera, a New York City Fire Department EMT.Rivera tested positive for cocaine in a random workplace drug test -- registering more than 250 times the official cut-off.The Department had previously sent him for… [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 9:00 pm
Rodriguez (San Diego, CA)Kruger v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 9:10 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 May 2010, 2:01 pm
New York, 268 U.S. 652, 667 (1925); id. at 673 (Holmes, J., dissenting). [read post]
17 May 2010, 6:35 am
Stephen Carter argues in a New York Times op-ed that “Ms. [read post]
12 May 2010, 5:14 am
New York, 445 U.S. 573 (1980), the U.S. [read post]
9 May 2010, 9:14 pm
” [via Lexisone] Manuel Antonio Rodriguez v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 4:16 pm
If the employee is represented by a person who is not an attorney, the administrative body may send a copy to the representative but it must serve the employee to start the statute of limitations running.To illustrate this point, in Weeks v State of New York, 198 AD2d 615, the Appellate Division refused to recognize the date of the delivery of a decision to an employee's union representative as the date from which to measure when the statute of limitations… [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 10:21 am
New York, 445 U.S. 573, 100 S.Ct. 1371, 63 L.Ed.2d 639 (1980). [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 5:04 am
District Court for the Southern District of New York 1994). [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 6:37 pm
Yet, both the United States Supreme Court and the New York Court of Appeals have long recognized that a party's failure to produce evidence which would elucidate the transaction in issue, when that party has it peculiarly within his power to produce such evidence, supports an instruction that the jury can draw an adverse inference that the testimony, if produced, would have been unfavorable to the party who failed to produce it. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:57 am
., Non-Party-Appellants, DAYANARA RODRIGUEZ, an infant by her , Plaintiffs, v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 12:43 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKBusiness LawShareholders' Suit Against Moody's Remanded; Complaint Alleged Only State Law ClaimsFlynn v. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 7:01 am
Co., 29 AD3d 547, 547, quoting Matter of Rodriguez v Wing, 251 AD2d 335, 336). [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 5:30 am
City of New York, 72 F.3d 1051 (2d Cir. 1995). [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 4:13 am
Crotty Saland, LLP is a New York based criminal defense firm. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 5:19 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 11:29 am
City of New York, 129 S. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 7:22 am
Finally, Above the Law reports on comments last week by Gerard Lynch during a speech in New York City. [read post]
