Search for: "Roger Alford"
Results 281 - 300
of 365
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Oct 2009, 1:03 am
Related posts:Conference on European Tort Law The European Centre of Tort and Insurance Law will...Colloquium on Choice of Law Clauses On 10 June 2009, the Institute for Civil and...Asserting Personal Jurisdiction in Human Rights Cases My colleague Roger Alford has a fascinating post over... [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 10:09 am
by Roger Alford Curtis Bradley and Jack Goldsmith have a nice piece in Green Bag on foreign sovereign immunity as applied to current and former government officials. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 8:33 am
by Roger Alford Today it was announced that Barack Obama has been awarded the Nobel Peace Prize. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 4:58 pm
by Roger Alford With the Supreme Court term now underway, here is a summary of the most important cases that relate to international law. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 8:13 pm
Over at Opinio Juris, my co-blogger Roger Alford notes the issuance today of the Second Circuit’s “long-awaited decision of Presbyterian Church of Sudan v. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 3:32 pm
by Roger Alford Today the Second Circuit issued the long-awaited decision of Presbyterian Church of Sudan v. [read post]
13 Sep 2009, 4:08 pm
by Roger Alford 1. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 11:31 am
My colleague Roger Alford has a fascinating post over at the blog Opinio Juris (available  here)  detailing a recent decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in the case of Bauman v. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 7:09 pm
Roger Alford has a post up at Opinio Juris commenting on the recent 9th Circuit opinion in Bauman v. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 10:21 am
by Roger Alford The Ninth Circuit last week argued that it did not have personal jurisdiction over DaimlerChrysler Corporation AG because it did not have continuous and systematic contacts with the forum. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 10:52 am
Over at Opinio Juris, Roger Alford notes that the "Cash for Clunkers" program has seemed to favor non-U.S. car-makers such as Toyota and Honda over the U.S. car-makers (with the caveat that some Toyota and Honda cars are made, in part at least, in the U.S.): consumers are showing a preference for imported cars when they purchase under the program, with Toyota (17%) and Honda (14%) leading the way. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 10:14 am
Roger Alford (Pepperdine) has an interesting take on my quarterly traffic ranking (by visitors and page views) of the Top 35 blogs edited by law professors: he re-ranks the blogs based on their "average visit length. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 12:32 am
Perhaps our President is acting with more restraint than many think he should but perhaps he's heeding Roger Alford's recent discovery reported in Opinio Juris. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 4:51 am
Rogers (Pennsylvania State Univ. - Law) & Roger P. [read post]
19 Apr 2009, 11:41 am
That question crossed my mind when I read this story today by Roger Alford in the Lexington Kentucky Herald-Leader. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 11:03 am
Roger Paul Alford (Pepperdine University - School of Law) has posted Lower Courts and Constitutional Comparativism (Fordham Law Review, Vol. 77, November 2008) on SSRN. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 7:26 am
Roger Alford at Opinio Juris sums up that, “based on this logic, foreign plaintiffs stand in the shoes of ex pat Americans living abroad. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 4:49 pm
Teresa Alford had been in the stands behind one of the goals while the teams were warming up and many balls were being shot by the players towards the goal. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 7:16 am
Related posts:Some Significant Forum Non Conveniens Decisions Since Sinochem While the long-term practical effect of Sinochem on the American...When the Forum Conveniens Can Be “Convinced” to Refuse the Case Roger Alford at Opinio juris has an interesting post on...Jurisdiction and Forum Non Conveniens in Quebec In Impulsora Turistica de Occidente v. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 5:45 am
Over at Opinio Juris, everyone's favorite international law blog, Roger Alford (pictured) has a post about United States v. [read post]
