Search for: "Royal v. State" Results 281 - 300 of 2,223
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2021, 11:40 am by Simon Lester
Spain, the tribunal was of a view that the state’s assurances that originated from Royal Decree 661/2007 and which stated that the original rate of returns would remain were so ‘adamantly clear’ that it did not require a ‘particularly sophisticated analysis’, such as legal due diligence. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
’ (Para 10) The earliest royal to have their will sealed up on the order of the President of what was then the Probate, Divorce and Admiralty Division, was His Serene Highness Prince Francis of Teck, the brother of King George V’s wife, Queen Mary. [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 4:50 pm by INFORRM
Lawrence Sanders, State University of New York at Buffalo. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 3:59 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Permission to appeal to the Supreme Court was granted on the two questions stated above. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 6:11 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
Yet, in both Teva and Royal Pharma, the CJEU pronounced itself only on Article 3(a) of the Regulation. [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 9:01 am by Richard Hunt
July 1, 2021) and Love v Royal Pacific Motel, 2021 WL 2711731 (N.D. [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Second, Sanambar v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
11 Jul 2021, 3:10 pm by Mitu Gulati
The discussion focused on the 11th Circuit’s recent decision in Myhra v. [read post]
5 Jul 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Third, R (on the application of AB) v Secretary of State for Justice. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 9:04 am
     ‘Un Somaro Piumato’--Rethinking the Scope and Nature of State Liability for Acts of their Commercial Instrumentalities: State Owned Enterprises and State-Owner Liability in the Post-Global Larry Catá Backer[1]   Abstract: Under what circumstances might a state be subject to liability for the conduct of its state owned enterprises (SOEs)? [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 SC, CB and 8 children (Appellants) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions and others (Respondents), heard 20-22 October 2020 Pakistan International Airline Corporation v Times Travel (UK) Ltd,… [read post]