Search for: "Rule v. Simon"
Results 281 - 300
of 1,343
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2020, 4:49 pm
Newspapers Journalism and Regulation The Press Gazette had a piece “Marketers urged to ‘back don’t block British journalism’ as Covid-19 hits online advertising” IPSO IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolutions statements since our last Round Up: 08645-19 A Man v The Sunday Times, 1 Accuracy (2019), 2 Privacy (2019), 6 Children (2019), no breach- after investigation 07416-19 Englefield Estate v readingchronicle.co.uk, 1 Accuracy… [read post]
22 Mar 2020, 5:12 pm
Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings in media law cases are outstanding: Aven v Orbis Business Intelligence, heard 16 to 19 March 2020 (Warby J) Hijazi v Yaxley-Lennon, heard 12 March 2020 (Nicklin J) ZXC v Bloomberg, heard 3 and 4 March 2020 (Underhill, Bean and Simon LJJ) Sube v News Group Newspapers, heard 4 to 7 February 2020 (Warby J) W M Morrison Supermarkets plc v V [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 11:01 am
The rule will also address work search actions for claimants. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 5:36 pm
Mr Justice Mann ruled that the claim relating to allegations about what the legal department knew could be aired at a trial. [read post]
8 Mar 2020, 5:10 pm
On 3 and 4 March 2020 the Court of Appeal (Underhill, Bean and Simon LJJ) heard the appeal in the case of ZXC v Bloomberg. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 6:17 am
Silk, Sabastian V. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 1:04 pm
Del Rio Sanchez v Simple Properties Management Limited. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 9:16 am
The court’s unanimous ruling Tuesday in Rodriguez v. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 8:00 am
The 53-State Solution By Simon Barnicle, Writer and Attorney Simon Barnicle writes that adding new Democratic states could help bring the United States closer to majority-rule, and could increase pressure to add constitutional amendments to counteract current minority-rule constitutional provisions, like the Electoral College and the equal representation of senators. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 8:59 am
What’s the legal status of an automated fair use ruling? [read post]
26 Jan 2020, 3:15 am
Computer and Internet Weekly Updates for 2020-01-18 https://t.co/g0xZHv6fCW 2020-01-19 Consequences of breaching search order by plaintiff TBD (Owen Holland) Ltd v Simons & Ors [2020] EWHC 30 (Ch) (17 J… https://t.co/TexrXdRpxR 2020-01-20 ONSC applies false light privacy tort, awards $300,000 in damages https://t.co/5aVZBKc0n6 2020-01-21 RT @danmichaluk: ONSC applies false light privacy tort, awards $300,000 in damages https://t.co/sHTBTuk617 2020-01-21… [read post]
26 Jan 2020, 3:15 am
Computer and Internet Weekly Updates for 2020-01-18 https://t.co/g0xZHv6fCW 2020-01-19 Consequences of breaching search order by plaintiff TBD (Owen Holland) Ltd v Simons & Ors [2020] EWHC 30 (Ch) (17 J… https://t.co/TexrXdRpxR 2020-01-20 ONSC applies false light privacy tort, awards $300,000 in damages https://t.co/5aVZBKc0n6 2020-01-21 RT @danmichaluk: ONSC applies false light privacy tort, awards $300,000 in damages https://t.co/sHTBTuk617 2020-01-21… [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 12:31 pm
After the Eastern District of New York ruling in Great Minds v. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 1:31 am
Love, and Norman V. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 3:35 pm
By way of example, the Ontario Human Rights Tribunal in Markovic v Autocom Manufacturing Ltd. provided useful guidance on the extent of employer’s duty to accommodate employees for non-statutory religious holidays.[1] Markovic involved a human rights complaint in which the employee alleged that his employer had discriminated against him on the basis of his creed by failing to pay him for the time he took off work for Eastern Orthodox Christmas on January 7, 2004. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 2:25 pm
The Simon court explained its reasoning by citing to Dickerson v. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 12:00 pm
Simon Cooper11. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 12:35 pm
Rodriguez v. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 7:41 am
In his core ruling that the uninsured ban clashes with the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), Simon was correct. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 4:31 pm
” As Warby J said in Doyle v Smith [2018] EWHC 2935 (QB) – “This is a beguilingly simple sentence. [read post]
