Search for: "S. T. " Results 281 - 300 of 742,149
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
The reasoning was thatthere was a change in the subject of the proceedings due to the filing of new claims together with the statement of grounds; and thatthe statement of grounds set out in detail why the raised grounds for opposition did not prejudice the maintenance of the patent as amended on the basis of these new claims (cf. in particular T 717/01 [2]; T 934/02 [2], referring to J xx/87[1.4] and T 105/87).[2.4.4] In the board’s view, it is certainly… [read post]
8 Jun 2007, 6:07 am
from the diaries of the tennessee dude... this new u.s. supreme court configuration is a little sneaky, sort of like watching yourself age...it may appear that one day you wake up and notice that "suddenly" you don't look like the man or woman in that picture from 20 years ago...the extra crows feet here, the peppering of grey hair there and you wonder how did that... [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 5:01 pm by or
Similarly, it cites T 39/82, T 142/84, T 332/90, T 485/91 and T 25/97 for supporting that a new application of a known measure cannot lead to an inventive step if the problem does not change.The above cannot lead to the Board to exceptionally admit the evidence relating to the alleged public prior use of its own motion in the appeal proceedings.In assessing whether it qualifies as closest prior art, also the function of the guide has to be taken into… [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 7:02 am
Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), recently announced the voluntary recall of Kraft's Tassimo espresso T Discs. [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 7:02 am
Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), recently announced the voluntary recall of Kraft's Tassimo espresso T Discs. [read post]
4 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Here even the substantiation of the objection of [lack of] novelty was quite scanty, and, therefore, it is quite questionable whether the condition established in T 222/85 – according to which the contents of such notice have to be sufficient for the opponent’s case to be properly understood on an objective basis [headnote 2] – is satisfied. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 11:00 pm
The creditor also asserted that since the title remained in the couple’s joint names, it was not on notice of any purported claim held by T and was damaged as a direct and proximate result (as it extended credit based, in part, on the former husband’s joint ownership of the Jane Street property).While the New York County Supreme Court believed there was some merit to the creditor’s argument, the Appellate Division, First Department,… [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 6:00 am by The Dear Rich Staff
(One exception: If it's a limited edition artwork or fine art work -- for example, signed and numbered photographs created in limited editions of 200 or fewer copies -- you can't destroy it.)But it's not so simple. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 11:12 am
Everyone has an opinion about AT&T's $39 billion buyout of T-Mobile. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 12:50 pm
The Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (GLAAD) no longer supports AT&T's $39 billion buyout of T-Mobile. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 2:57 pm by rainey Reitman
This came in response to questions that EFF submitted during Legere’s Twitter Q&A session about the new T-Mobile service, Binge On. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 2:44 pm by Jon Brodkin
The FCC granted T-Mobile’s request today, rejecting arguments made by AT&T and Verizon. [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
That this was also the board’s view in decision T 939/92 may be inferred from paragraph 2.2.1 of the decision:“However, the present independent claim covers certain chemical compounds per se, and not just those compounds having a particular biological activity. [read post]