Search for: "S. v. D."
Results 281 - 300
of 62,633
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Nov 2011, 3:47 am
Regina v Oldfield [2011] WLR (D) 337 “Where an application by a defendant to withdraw a plea of guilty involved a conflict between the defendant’s evidence and the evidence of his former counsel, the practice at many court centres by which a judge from elsewhere would be brought in to hear the application was to be commended.” WLR Daily, 22nd November 2011 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
3 May 2012, 2:11 am
Regina v Mian [2012] EWCA Crim 792; [2012] WLR (D) 129 “In the context of a prosecutor’s appeal against a ‘terminating ruling’, the statutory requirement that either an adjournment had to be sought immediately, or the decision to appeal and the acquittal agreement had to be notified to the court immediately, meant that it should be done then and there. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 3:43 pm
Missouri V. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 3:32 am
Drake v Harvey and others [2011] EWCA Civ 838; [2011] WLR (D) 244 “There was no general default rule or presumption that the basis on which an outgoing partner’s share of partnership assets was to be determined was a fair value unless the partnership deed expressly stated otherwise; the correct approach was to derive the basis of valuation from the terms of the deed itself applying normal principles of contractual… [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 1:51 am
Regina v Major [2010] WLR (D) 309 “The Registrar of Criminal Appeals had power to grant a representation order in respect of an application or appeal against a restraining order imposed on acquittal of an offence, pursuant to the provisions of s 5A of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 1:37 am
Jayasinghe v Liyanage [2010] EWHC 265 (Ch); [2010] WLR (D) 44 “The adjudicator to the Land Registry had jurisdiction to conduct a trial of the question of beneficial entitlement to property where an objection to an application was made to the registrar and the matter referred to the adjudicator under s 73(7) of the Land Registration Act 2002. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 2:12 am
Regina v Iqbal [2010] WLR (D) 23 “An application for the time for proceedings for a confiscation order to be postponed, or for a postponement to be extended, may be made only during the permitted period provided for in s 14 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 3:42 am
Regina v Nursing [2012] EWCA Crim 2521; [2012] WLR (D) 360 “The offence of wilfully neglecting a person who lacked capacity, contrary to section 44(2) of the Mental Capacity Act 2005, was not legally uncertain. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 1:22 pm
The D. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 12:33 pm
S. 826, 836 (2011); see Paroline v. [read post]
31 Jul 2010, 10:30 am
In INS v. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 7:20 am
(“G&D”) and several of G&D’s subsidiaries, including Deutsch & Gilden, Inc. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 8:51 am
Helow v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] UKHL 62; [2008] WLR (D) 00; [2008] WLR (D) 326 “A judge’s membership of a Jewish association whose magazine had expressed extreme views against Palestinian causes did not in itself imply that the judge shared or endorsed such views so as to require her determination of an immigration appeal by a Palestinian activist to be set aside. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 8:00 am
”--Robert S. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 8:53 am
Shay Construction, Inc., 805 F.Supp.2d 1125 (D. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 2:59 am
Kennedy v Information Commissioner and another [2010] WLR (D) 6 “The Information Tribunal was correct in holding that the wording of s 32(2) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 had a very wide scope. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 7:55 am
By Eric Goldman D'Agostino v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 10:26 am
By Jason Rantanen Ericsson, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 2:32 pm
S. 90 (1967); Schlagenhauf v. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 3:05 am
Regina v T (N) [2010] EWCA Crim 711; [2010] WLR (D) 93 ”The prosecution were not entitled to apply for leave to appeal against a terminating ruling made by a judge in a Crown Court on a trial on indictment, unless it had complied with the mandatory requirements of s 58(4) and (8) of the Criminal Justice Act 2003, following the making of the ruling, of informing the court that it intended to appeal or requesting an adjournment to consider such an appeal and,… [read post]
