Search for: "SCALES v. STATE" Results 281 - 300 of 4,886
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2017, 8:18 am
  One observer noted that it was difficult to see how Courts of different member states would follow this (controversial) relief when Courts from different me [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 7:30 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit decided the case of United States of America, Appellant, v. [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 5:21 pm by Stuart Kaplow
It is more than the state putting it thumb on the scale when the courts have no alternative but to back bad energy policy. [read post]
22 May 2019, 7:47 am by Eric Goldman
Though the court doesn’t mention the old Zippo precedent, the court engages in an analogous and very old-school “sliding-scale” analysis using the 10th Circuit Shrader v. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 11:50 am by Adam Feldman
States’ policies in these areas were each scaled from 0 to 3.5 (when applicable due to sufficient gradations in state laws), with zero relating to a liberal approach and 3.5 equating to a more conservative policy. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Supreme Court case that approved large-scale modern urban renewal”, facilitated a bulldozer redevelopment of Washington, D.C. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 7:26 am
In that case, Birss transferred the proceedings from the PCC to the High Court because Comic Enterprises ran the action as if it was full scale High Court style litigation rather that if it were a more modest claim in the PCC. [read post]
17 Jun 2007, 8:10 pm
Nor, the state continues, is certiorari warranted based either on the prospect of overruling the Court's decision in Murray v. [read post]
Völker Türk, the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, called for states to tackle corruption in order to address the problem, saying anti-corruption efforts “must be as much a part of the response to these scams as a robust criminal justice response. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 6:25 am by Ben Rubin
Wisc.) praised the result, stating that private property rights need to be protected from improper government seizure, citing the case of Kelo v. [read post]