Search for: "SHAW v. CALIFORNIA" Results 281 - 300 of 345
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2010, 4:28 am
Shaw Rose Nets (Patently-O) (Inventive Step) District Court S D California: In re TS Tech and In re Genentech do not apply where the requested venue is a neighbouring district: HP Hood LLC v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 2:30 pm
Accordingly, the California Court of Appeal (Fourth Appellate District, Division One) vacated the punitive damages award. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm by admin
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 1:36 pm by Adam Schlossman
Board of Education –Nina Totenberg, legal affairs correspondent for National Public Radio “The Global Impact of Brown v. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 1:35 am
California - The California Supreme Court upholds the attorney-client privilege for outside counsel’s communications to a corporate client Seyfarth Shaw LLP "On November 30, 2009, in a highly anticipated ruling, the California Supreme Court strongly preserved the sanctity of the attorney-client privilege in Randall et al. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 3:48 pm
The 40-page complaint, filed in Superior Court of California in Los Angeles, claims that Seyfarth Shaw breached its fiduciary duty to Lancaster by forcing him to relinquish his equity share. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:47 pm
        Pharmaceutical Sales Reps, Certification of Issues to California Supreme Court:  D’Este v. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 3:19 pm by Erika Birg
In an article published today by the Daily Journal, "Economy Leads Companies to Sue Ex-Workers," (linked with permission) author Laura Ernde talks with a number of California practitioners about what they see happening with trade secrets litigation in the wake of the California Supreme Court's ruling in Edwards v. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 8:28 pm
The Court of Appeal held in The Retirement Group v. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 10:58 am
Seyfarth Shaw, in which the Court of Appeal ordered a new trial on all issues, resulting in the reversal of a $15 million punitive damages award). [read post]