Search for: "STATE IN THE INTEREST OF M. C., ET AL."
Results 281 - 300
of 523
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2023, 6:00 am
Decided and Entered:April 6, 2023 535386 In the Matter of the Arbitration between County of Albany, Respondent, and Civil Service Employees Association, Inc., Local 1000, AFSCME, AFL-CIO, Albany County Local 801, et al., Appellants. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 6:00 am
Decided and Entered:April 6, 2023 535386 In the Matter of the Arbitration between County of Albany, Respondent, and Civil Service Employees Association, Inc., Local 1000, AFSCME, AFL-CIO, Albany County Local 801, et al., Appellants. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 3:01 pm
In contrast, critics have seen CSR as an intrusion of corporate interests in the public sphere where government is strong. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 7:14 am
It takes very little change in interest rates to attract additional world saving to the United States. [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 10:05 pm
In their newly published review paper[4], O’Bryan et al. explain that, although the current USDA qualitative performance standards have lowered the prevalence of Salmonella found on raw poultry products, progress has stalled on lowering the cases of salmonellosis associated with poultry. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
Skelos, et al., Respondents, vDavid Paterson, & c., et al., Appellants. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 7:00 am
A., De Dreu, C. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 6:00 pm
State of Indiana , an 8-page opinion, Judge Riley writes:Appellant-Defendant, Chad M. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 5:28 am
Mud Buddy, LLC d/b/a Mud Buddy Manufacturing (Docket Report) District Court Utah: Post-motion correction of discovery deficiency warrants sanctions: CleanCut v Rug Doctor et al (Docket Report) District Court C D California answers: May an inventor previously employed by plaintiff’s predecessor-in-interest serve as an expert for defendant? [read post]
25 Jan 2014, 2:25 pm
BE IT ENACTED by the Senate and General Assembly of the State of New Jersey: 11. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 3:41 pm
IP rights: find a party interested in creating/disseminating the good & give them exclusive control. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 10:54 am
Ingerman Smith LLP et al., CV 2012-0307 (ILG) (MDG) (E.D.N.Y. [read post]
6 Jun 2009, 2:21 pm
SMITH, ET AL. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2021, 1:34 pm
The Committee relied on its standard 4A-criteria: Availability, accessibility, acceptability and adaptability.[6] Functioning institutions and programs must be available in the state, but also physically and economically accessible for all—without discrimination in law or in fact. [read post]
18 May 2010, 1:10 am
Source Photonics, Inc. et al. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm
Introduction In going all the way to the United States Supreme Court, Kelo v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 5:08 am
After last year’s guidelines on black and white marks, reported by the IPKat here, it is now the turn of trade marks sharing elements with little or no distinctiveness.* Pom Wonderful the tenacious -- in pursuit of trade mark rightsNeil's first post of this year is about Pom Wonderful LLC v Hubbard et al, a decision rendered a few days ago by the 9th U.S. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 2:16 pm
News & Analysis 11111-11114 (2010).Batker, David, et al. [read post]
4 Feb 2012, 10:04 am
., ET AL., Appellants, vs. [read post]
