Search for: "STATE v GOMEZ"
Results 281 - 300
of 615
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Aug 2015, 3:41 pm
The record here indicates the Marshals in the Southern District pointed to problems arising from the existence of three courthouses, ostensibly brought about by the 2012 opening of a new, state-of-the-art courthouse which, unlike Roybal, presumably was designed to accommodate modern security concerns. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 9:07 am
In Hooks v. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 9:07 am
In Hooks v. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 6:16 am
Gomez presents the issue of whether an offer of complete relief on a plaintiff’s claims renders a case moot and therefore beyond the judicial power of Article III—a question the Supreme Court was unable to answer in Genesis Healthcare Corp. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 10:15 am
United States — proof needed to convict a public official for criminal extortion under the Hobbs Act DirecTV v. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 10:24 am
” The Court will review the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Gomez v. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 9:00 am
Supreme Court’s grant of certiorari in Gomez v. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 8:00 am
In Gomez v. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
Gomez v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 11:42 am
At issue is a civil lawsuit against the State. [read post]
28 May 2015, 8:38 am
S. 833 (1986), and two decisions involving federal magistrates, Gomez v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 8:38 am
S. 833 (1986), and two decisions involving federal magistrates, Gomez v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 10:19 am
Gomez, 14-857, which was once rescheduled before its relist, (fittingly) involves an ad agency that, after being sued for an ill-advised text-message campaign for the U.S. [read post]
20 May 2015, 3:08 pm
The case, Campbell-Ewald Co. v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 6:45 am
Gomez, in which it will consider issues related to mootness and class actions. [read post]
18 May 2015, 3:02 pm
Supreme Court agreed to review in Gomez v. [read post]
18 May 2015, 11:31 am
The denial of review in O’Keefe v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 2:15 pm
Kim, that under United States v. [read post]
8 May 2015, 9:18 am
Gomez, 14-857, began last week among the lowly ranks of rescheduled cases but now has blossomed into a full-fledged relist. [read post]
