Search for: "STATE v LANCE"
Results 281 - 300
of 442
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2011, 1:09 pm
You betcha.In state after state, whether product liability is common-law or statutory, and whether it’s based on the Second or Third Restatement, courts have refused to allow plaintiffs to make claims asserting that legal products should not have been sold at all. [read post]
United States v. Fosler: CAAF holds Article 134 adultery sample specification fails to state offense
8 Aug 2011, 11:53 pm
Is Parker v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 4:03 pm
Ruthann Robson blogs over (here) at Constitutional Law Profs about the decision in Planned Parenthood of Kansas v. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 7:23 am
-Gary V. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 8:44 am
Since that post, we’ve added Lance v. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 6:33 am
As a law school student at Yale, Jeremy Goldman was enraptured by David Boies' commanding, if losing, performance in Bush v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 6:22 am
publication of this classic book (Foundation Press, 2001), although highly influential through its use as a classroom text at Harvard Law School, and passed around in (unpublished) manuscript form, the authors simply couldn’t bring themselves to publish this book because, anchored as it was in the structural/process liberalism of the new administrative state, it had almost nothing to say about Brown v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 7:56 am
Grama (Purdue IT), David Hoffman (Intel), Lance Hoffman (GWU Computer Science), Joanne McNabb (Cal Dept. of Consumer Affairs), Lisa S. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 2:59 am
324/09 L’Oréal SA, Lancôme parfums et beauté & Cie, Laboratoire Garnier & Cie, L’Oréal (UK) Limited v eBay International AG, eBay Europe SARL and eBay (UK) Limited has now been posted on the Curia website. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 2:58 am
324/09 L’Oréal SA, Lancôme parfums et beauté & Cie, Laboratoire Garnier & Cie, L’Oréal (UK) Limited v eBay International AG, eBay Europe SARL and eBay (UK) Limited. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 7:28 am
The following is an essay for our symposium on Arizona v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 7:21 am
Costs v. [read post]
19 May 2011, 7:47 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, of extraterritorial jurisdiction principles at issue in a case called United States v. [read post]
18 May 2011, 12:13 pm
Lawyers and non-lawyers may or may not recognize the case of Snyder v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 9:22 am
Bailey, Jr. and Lance T. [read post]
3 May 2011, 10:20 am
Hoffman La Roche, Inc., 618 N.W.2d 827, 840 (Neb. 2000); Lance v. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 7:43 am
Katz, Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP, Los Angeles 6 $257,679,500 Consumer Protection State of Louisiana v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm
At least the state of the art at the time of the plaintiff’s use applies – unknown and later discovered risks are irrelevant. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 3:14 pm
In Snyder v. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 3:43 am
(This week: Libel, hyperinjunctions, Lautsi v Italy, Expert immunity and Interns) We sit around a small table, drink wine and talk about topical issues. [read post]
