Search for: "STATE v. BATES"
Results 281 - 300
of 645
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2014, 1:23 pm
See United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 10:13 am
Circuit came out the other way in a 2-1 decision in Halbig v. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 12:26 pm
Moreover, although not determinative, Matter of Armstrong v Heilker v Heilker and Matter of Bates v Bates held that the mental health of a parent is necessarily relevant in every custody or visitation proceeding. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 9:12 am
”Id. at 1141-42 (various citations omitted).Courts in other states following this general approach are: Haygood v. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 5:55 am
In Bates v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 7:04 am
While the appeals court remanded for a trial on those two issues, it upheld the jury’s finding that the employer’s drug tests were neither job related nor a matter of business necessity (Bates v Dura Automotive Systems, Inc, August 26, 2014, Cook, D). [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 3:57 am
"Much depends on Dura’s credibility," the court said, stating it was possible a jury could see Dura’s explanation as a pretext, or find that the drug test had targeted information about employees' physical or mental health, regardless of Dura’s stated intent.But it was not a matter of law that Dura violated the ADA.The case is Bates et al. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm
That is what happened in United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 6:06 am
Media lawyers have been waiting with bated breath for judicial interpretation of the 2013 Act; in particular Section 1(1). [read post]
9 Aug 2014, 7:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
We await the reargued decision with bated breath – actually that’s not true; we’d be bluer than a Blue Dog Democrat if that were so. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 11:00 am
Board Decision and Girl Scouts of the United States” Commentator: Martha Jones Closing Comments: Sarah Barringer Gordon [read post]
28 Jun 2014, 12:11 pm
Having discussed the Aereo saga quite extensively through its litigation life cycle (speculation on the Supreme Court decision can be found here, discussion on the District Court decision here), this writer for one bated his breath waiting for the US Supreme Court decision on the case. [read post]
29 May 2014, 9:42 am
But the U.K. appeal court determined, because Bates van Winkelholf was a partner, she did not qualify for employee whistleblower protections.Similar reasoning was applied in the McCormick decision in Canada, but in Bates van Winkelhof’s case, the UK Supreme Court overturned the lower court ruling.The decision states: “As the case of the controlling shareholder in a company who is also employed as chief executive shows, one can effectively be one's own boss… [read post]
5 May 2014, 1:14 pm
: GPO, United States Commission of Civil Rights, 1970. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm
TCRR states that nothing in the postwar years hinted at the mass mobilizations that would soon be exploding into the national consciousness. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm
TCRR states that nothing in the postwar years hinted at the mass mobilizations that would soon be exploding into the national consciousness. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 4:44 am
GoDaddy.com, LLC v. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 8:42 am
Bates and numerous others). [read post]
6 Apr 2014, 9:30 am
Under a 1971 Supreme Court decision, Bivens v. [read post]
