Search for: "STATE v. BRAIN" Results 281 - 300 of 2,688
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2022, 6:48 am by Matthew Hersh (Wolters Kluwer)
The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) correctly determined that a Korean biopharmaceutical company did not use in commerce the mark for a nutritional product that purportedly improves brain performance, the United States Court for the Federal Circuit has held. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 10:48 am by Jon Sands
  The state courts did not unreasonably deny a claim that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate possible organic brain damage. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 8:31 am
"However, the State recognized that this brain injury did not diminish Schutz's ability to understand his actions. [read post]
21 Aug 2010, 6:27 am
By the time they arrived the damage had accelerated; the delay resulted in brain damage. [read post]
30 Oct 2010, 8:58 pm by Matthew Nelson
On Friday, October 29, 2010, the Michigan Supreme Court decided In re Certified Question (Waeschle v. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 7:19 pm by Gordon Johnson
The “Show Me” State is one of many across the nation to enact such a law. [read post]
30 Oct 2024, 6:07 am by Above the Law
* David Boies thinks the Supreme Court doesn't want a Bush v. [read post]