Search for: "STATE v. HARMS" Results 281 - 300 of 25,801
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2021, 8:21 am by Robbie Stern
In X (South Yorkshire) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWHC 2954 (Admin), the Divisional Court declared that the Guidance was unlawful insofar as it did not require the decision maker to consider whether to invite the subject to make representations. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 1:46 pm
Plaintiffs claim that global warming, to which Defendants contribute as the "five largest emitters of carbon dioxide in the United States and . . . among the largest in the world," Connecticut v. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 10:22 am
Recently, South Carolina joined the ranks of states standing up to insurers on this issue, with the state supreme court ruling in Williams v. [read post]
28 May 2020, 2:05 am by INFORRM
” (Q.554) (emphasis added) The Consequence: It is difficult to reconcile the desire of the Secretary of State to erect “hard walls”, in order to avoid unintended consequences, with the government’s apparent determination to leave the notion of harm undefined, delegating to the regulator the task of deciding what counts as harmful. [read post]