Search for: "STATE v. MULL" Results 281 - 300 of 318
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2009, 4:06 am
EEO/iNews from State CourtsiNews Related to Equal Employment Opportunity Source: iNews © 2009 John D. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 3:47 am
Apr. 17, 2009)Affirming JV ($10K wages; $20K comps; $220K atty fees) for fired rental car company station manager on her sex harass-based retaliation/discharge state law claims; but reducing punitive damages award from $500K to $120K)Commentary on previously reported Federal Appellate Court decisions> 3rd Cir.o o No need to accommodate shorter commuteParker v. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 4:00 am
Salem State College 2nd Cir.o A Win for Working MothersChadwick v. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 3:49 am
Mar. 24, 2009)Affirming dismissal of White cops' 2003 race/layoff claims based on a 1973 Consent DecreeFantini v Salem State College, No. 07-2026 (1st Cir. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 4:00 am
Amelia County Sheriff's Office7th Cir.o Muslim Associate States Cause of Action Against Large Law Firm For Post 9-11 DiscriminationHasan v. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
(Class 46) Trading Standards officers uses new inspection powers granted under Copyright, Designs and Patent Act (Out-Law)   United States US General IP legislation to watch in 2009 (Law360) IP cases to follow in 2009 (Law360) US Trade Representative issues statement on Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ContentAgenda) Does the Federal Circuit need a fresh viewpoint? [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 10:50 am
The RabiesVaccinationChallengeinTN Yahoo Group they formed can be found at[pets.groups.yahoo.com]v=1&t=search&ch=web&pub=groups&sec=group&slk=3 . [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 1:47 pm
I am mulling over a paper written by Naomi Cahn of George Washington University - Law School and June Carbone of the University of Missouri at Kansas City School of Law, Red Families v. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 2:12 pm
The most recent of those "adverse decisions" was McCrea v. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 4:29 am
The high court is scheduled to consider whether to take up the case, Dupuy v. [read post]