Search for: "STATE v. TWIST"
Results 281 - 300
of 2,160
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2021, 4:47 am
Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008) and United States v Miller, 307 U.S. 174 (1939). [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 12:01 pm
In Clinton v. [read post]
31 May 2021, 7:51 pm
The New York Court of Appeals’ 2012 opinion in Pappas v Tzolis, decided in the wake and spirit of that court’s rulings the year before in the Centro Empresarial v America Movil and Arfa v Zamir cases, raised the bar for claims of fraud and breach of fiduciary duty brought by non-controlling shareholders and LLC members in connection with buyout transactions. [read post]
24 May 2021, 3:56 am
Common-Law Dissolution Plaintiff Loses Fight Over Venue Last year I wrote about a federal court’s first-impression decision in Busher v Barry in which it applied the Burford abstention doctrine to dismiss, without prejudice to refiling in state court, the minority shareholders’ claim for common-law dissolution. [read post]
14 May 2021, 5:30 am
Palmer lays out the facts of the case pretty well: 1 Daniel (known as Dee) Snider is the lead singer of Twisted Sister, a heavy metal band based in the United States of America. [read post]
9 May 2021, 9:08 pm
Supreme Court’s 2000 decision in FDA v. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 9:44 am
State v. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 7:52 am
Ltd v Knight Steamship Co. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 4:59 pm
Black sites and state secrets In United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2021, 6:34 am
” In her dissenting opinion joined by Justices Elena Kagan and Stephen Breyer, Justice Sonia Sotomayor stated that the majority opinion “twists precedent” and “distorts Miller and Montgomery beyond recognition. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 10:32 am
United States, 20-559Issues: (1) Whether Feres v. [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 4:07 pm
The Secretary of State for Justice during the Second Reading of the Bill described concerns about “annoyance” as a “canard” (see further below). [read post]
11 Apr 2021, 10:18 am
Even after the Court’s twisted opinion in Supreme Beef v. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 12:43 am
The Secretary of State for Justice during the Second Reading of the Bill described concerns about “annoyance” as a “canard” (see further below). [read post]
26 Mar 2021, 1:33 pm
" See also Adams v. [read post]
26 Mar 2021, 3:18 am
The take-away from this case is that a “future profits” or projection of future losses based upon current events is tortious, twisted and requires many assumptions or (less positively) “speculations. [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 11:30 am
–Garnier v. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 10:28 am
That left the state law claims in the wrong court, so the case was remanded to the state court. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 10:14 am
Justice Marzari stated that Mr. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 5:01 am
[1] See Rainbow v. [read post]
