Search for: "STEVEN NELSON" Results 281 - 300 of 445
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2011, 4:52 am by Rob Robinson
http://tinyurl.com/6jorr5u (Robert Trenchard, Steven Berrent) Cease-and-Desist Letter Alone Ruled No Basis for Jurisdiction - http://tinyurl.com/3jufwqt (Sheri Qualters) Court Declines to Compel Government to Contribute to Creation of Database to Ease Defendant's Discovery Burden, Recommends Application for Assistance Pursuant to Criminal Justice Act - http://tinyurl.com/4xnvo7h (K&L Gates) Courts Struggle With Police Searches of Smartphones - http://tinyurl.com/44db5qb (Joshua… [read post]
1 May 2011, 8:38 am by Jacqueline Dowd
The plaintiffs are also seeking an injunction against the state and county to block public employees from taking personal property from campsites without adequate notice and without posting information about how to retrieve the items.The plaintiffs -- Joel Tucker, Steven Fletcher, Jeff Nelson, Robert Dean Thomas, Chanda Waulters and Mitchal Poncel -- lost personal items they said were taken during sweeps and then either lost or destroyed. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 4:45 pm by Minnesota Law Review
Volume 95, Issue 4 (April 2011): Articles Michael Steven Green, Erie’s Suppressed Premise, 95 Minn. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 10:42 pm by Jeffrey Richardson
  It's usually the most social spot at the conference. 4:30 - 5:30pm:  Mac Power Users by Brett Burney, Finis Price and Ben Stevens. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 5:35 pm by Donna
Mary Abraham The Law Factory Debate: Another Perspective – Steven Levy Legal Billing Rates: The Next Wave – John Wallbillich The Stratified Legal Market and its Implications – Jordan Furlong Deep Thoughts on the Future of Law Practice – Jim Calloway Future of Law Practice – On-Demand Video with Jim Calloway and Sharon Nelson [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 1:55 pm by Jeff Neuburger
The legal relevance of these and other assertions going to the conduct of Righthaven and Stevens is left unstated. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 5:23 am by Rob Robinson
http://tinyurl.com/4587syf (Peter Crusco) Chinese Hackers Break into Oil Company Networks – http://tinyurl.com/4v5onlo (Sharon Nelson) Compliance in the Cloud – The Discussion Continues – http://tinyurl.com/4gor7ca (Sumner Blount) Facial Recognition Technology Means Good-By Anonymity – http://tinyurl.com/4vsuvtv (Trent Livingston) Ga. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 11:20 am by Roshonda Scipio
Giannelli.Giannelli, Paul C.New Providence, NJ : LexisNexis Matthew Bender, 2009.EvidenceKF8935.Z9 G63 2009-2010Courtroom evidence handbook / by Steven Goode, Olin Guy Wellborn III.Goode, Steven.St. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 12:30 pm by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
., 182 East 98th Street, Washington/Lexington Houses, Manhattan Nelson Nieves case 1723/10 formerly associated with the 13th fl., 1875 Third Avenue, Washington/Lexington Houses, Manhattan Carlos Sutton case 3346/10 formerly associated with the 10th fl., 2250 West 11th Street, Marlboro Houses, Brooklyn Taquan Walston case 3503/10 formerly associated with the 2nd fl., 99 North Portland Avenue, Whitman Houses, Brooklyn D'Sean Williams case 3488/10 formerly… [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 4:18 am by Rob Robinson
http://bit.ly/eOWHrz (Matthew Nelson) Rule Against Broadcast of Telephone Conversation w/o Prior Permission is Constitutional Says FCC – http://tinyurl.com/4t6fhna (David Oxenford) Surveying Sanctions in eDiscovery Cases in 2010 and Judicial Reactions – http://bit.ly/hbmUGb (JurInnov) The Best eDiscovery Strategy Isn’t Perfect – http://bit.ly/eAUv8K (Mark Diamond) The Privilege of Being In-House – http://tinyurl.com/4fdsfq3 (Andi Balla) Time For a Bright-Line… [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 5:39 am by Rob Robinson
It’s Also Dangerous - http://bit.ly/hZlIsQ (Steven Seidenberg) Social Media and Law Enforcement: Who Gets What Data and When? [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 6:34 am by Amanda Rice
Nelson, Harrington v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 6:34 am by Amanda Rice
Nelson, Harrington v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 7:01 pm
Nelson, lower courts have very little freedom to say that an old Supreme Court case is no longer good law. [read post]