Search for: "Sales v. United States" Results 281 - 300 of 8,895
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2018, 4:53 am by David Post
Her customers are mostly in the United States and Canada. [read post]
20 Jan 2018, 4:53 am by David Post
Her customers are mostly in the United States and Canada. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 12:14 pm by Eileen McDermott
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit erred in applying the Lanham Act extraterritorially to Abitron’s foreign sales, “including purely foreign sales that never reached the United States or confused U.S. consumers. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 12:14 pm by Eileen McDermott
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit erred in applying the Lanham Act extraterritorially to Abitron’s foreign sales, “including purely foreign sales that never reached the United States or confused U.S. consumers. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 12:20 pm
Code § 2318:The United States criminal code, Title 18, criminalizes certain copyright violations. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 10:07 am by Christina D. Frangiosa
Costco, for the proposition that the first sale doctrine (§ 109(a)) "does not apply to items manufactured outside of the United States unless they were previously imported and sold in the United States with the copyright holder's permission. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 9:13 am by The Federalist Society
The question before the Supreme Court was whether the Federal Circuit erred in holding that supplying a single, commodity component of a multi-component invention from the United States exposes a manufacturer to liability for worldwide sales. [read post]
25 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm
While these ordinances often contain a “criminal component”, municipalities rarely enforce the criminal penalties, but deem them necessary to cause compliance.Notwithstanding the laudable intentions behind this type of point of sale ordinance, and the usual reluctance of municipalities to enforce the criminal penalties associated therewith, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio in Thompson V. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 8:27 pm
  In District of Columbia v. [read post]
10 Feb 2022, 2:39 pm by Dennis Crouch
Still, much of the sales activities occurred within the United States. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 8:50 am by The Federalist Society
The question before the United States Supreme Court was whether, in a regulatory taking case, the “parcel as a whole” concept as described in Penn Central Transportation Company v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 9:16 am by Dennis Crouch
The defendant asks: Whether the “on sale” bar found in § 102(b) applies only to sales or offers of sale made available to the public, as Congress, this Court, and the United States have all made clear, or whether it also applies to non-public sales or offers of sale, as the Federal Circuit has held. [read post]