Search for: "Scalia v. United States"
Results 281 - 300
of 4,620
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2022, 5:00 pm
The late Justice Antonin Scalia restated the ancient common law rule in Deshaney v. [read post]
4 Jun 2022, 6:49 am
, United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 11:00 am
But might So might one describe pre-2022 MLB as a form of “federalism” in which constituent units, each with their own measure of “sovereignty” were entitled to make their own rules, at least up to a point? [read post]
28 May 2022, 2:25 pm
Gonzales 7-2 ruling “Scalia’s 2005 Supreme Court decision. [read post]
27 May 2022, 12:50 pm
Not the least of which being the million-plus individuals in the United States who have died as a result of the pandemic.But there are also some much less important, albeit extant, upsides. [read post]
27 May 2022, 12:42 pm
United States (1957), which was modified in some measure by Miller v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 7:07 pm
United States. [read post]
23 May 2022, 6:26 pm
Read it here.In United States v. [read post]
20 May 2022, 1:56 pm
In my view, it is a mistake to conflate support for ever-increasing national government with love of the United States of America. [read post]
16 May 2022, 10:34 am
West, Brookings senior fellow; Isabel V. [read post]
11 May 2022, 8:40 am
" (United States v. [read post]
10 May 2022, 9:02 pm
Wade in Dobbs v. [read post]
10 May 2022, 2:08 pm
Similarly, there are no territorial limits on the federal government's jurisdiction within the United States. [read post]
3 May 2022, 7:33 am
It then also notes that the plaintiffs and the United States as amicus had connected the abortion right to the right of consenting adults to engage in same-sex sexual conduct (recognized in Lawrence v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 8:19 am
Perhaps most famously, following Justice Antonin Scalia’s death in February 2016, the court issued an equally divided decision in United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 6:30 am
Had one looked at this issue in 1921, the United States would have had company: At that time, Australia and Canada, countries that, like the United States, were influenced by the British tradition, provided judges with indefinite tenure during good behavior.[3]However, each of these countries amended their constitutions and adopted mandatory retirement ages for their federal judges later in the 20thcentury – 70 in Australia, 75 in Canada. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 8:30 am
This post was prepared for a roundtable on Reforming the Supreme Court of the United States, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022—a year-long series gathering scholars from diverse disciplines and viewpoints to reflect on Sandy Levinson’s influential work in constitutional law. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 7:28 am
In Branch v. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 1:34 pm
In a December case, United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 9:01 pm
In Smith, Justice Scalia stated that hybrid cases get strict scrutiny. [read post]
