Search for: "Schmidt v. Schmidt" Results 281 - 300 of 871
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jan 2018, 11:29 am by Jordan Brunner
  ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare Elena Chachko summarized Alyan v. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 7:53 pm by Randall Hodgkinson
Kimberly Streit Vogelsberg and Carol Longenecker Schmidt won in State v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 9:57 am by Wolfgang Demino
Hastings Law Journal has a new article (technically a "Note") on predatory lending and the implications of  Madden v Midland, written by a recent graduate. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 9:57 am by Wolfgang Demino
   Table of Contents and Excerpt from Rzeslawski's article on the implications of Madden v Midland for post-crash consumer remedies against predatory lending that occurred years earlier  Madden v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 8:20 am by Alfred Brophy
  The table of contents is as follows:   Herbert Lovelace, King Making: Brown v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 4:08 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” “In Schmidt v One New York Plaza (153 AD3d 427, 428 [1st Dept 2017]), the First Department reaffirmed the standard of review for a summary judgment motion: On a motion for summary judgment, the moving party has the initial burden of establishing its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law with evidence sufficient to eliminate any material issue of fact (Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324 [1985]). [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 6:40 pm by Randall Hodgkinson
Pablo Gonzalez, No. 112,841 (Pottawatomie)Direct appeal (petition for review); Unintentional second-degree murderCarol Longenecker Schmidt[Affirmed; Biles; March 9, 2018]Unintentional second-degree murder is unconstitutionally vagueInsufficient evidence of unintentional second-degree murderImproper answer to jury questionImproper limiting instruction re: prior bad act evidenceJanuary 24--Wednesday--a.m.State v. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 5:59 am by Joy Waltemath
Though the dismissal of their FLSA claims was reversed, dismissal of their separate claims under Maryland wage law was affirmed (Schilling v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Lipton and Laura Schmidt, both associates at the White & Williams law firm. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Lipton and Laura Schmidt, both associates at the White & Williams law firm. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 5:00 am by D Daniel Sokol
Jens Peter Schmidt asks Akzo Nobel and Others v Commission: When Can Parent Companies be Liable for the Acts of Subsidiaries Even if Action Against the Subsidiary is Time-barred? [read post]