Search for: "Sealed Plaintiff v. Sealed Defendant" Results 281 - 300 of 1,052
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2021, 8:23 pm by Allan Blutstein
DOJ (D.D.C.) -- determining that: (1) DEA performed reasonable search for records concerning plaintiff’s murder conviction and properly refused to search for records concerning plaintiff’s co-defendants on privacy grounds; and (2) DEA properly withheld records pursuant to Exemptions 6, 7(C), 7(D), 7(E), and 7(F). [read post]
1 May 2021, 5:12 am by Eugene Volokh
" In the process, two unusual things have happened: The judge responded by issuing a preliminary injunction ordering the defendants not to "publiciz[e], through social media or other channels, Plaintiff's personal identifying information," which apparently includes the policeman's name. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Now, Plaintiff seeks to file these opt-in notices either pseudonymously or under seal to conceal the identities of the opt-in plaintiffs from the Defendants and the public. [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
" (The brief arguing for this preliminary injunction, which was sealed when I first blogged about it, is now available, in lightly redacted form.) [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Those matters were expunged or sealed on Plaintiff's criminal record. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 8:23 am by Dennis Crouch
PATENT NO. 7,793,025. 276 10/08/2020 VLSI’S DAUBERT SEALED MOTIONS TO EXCLUDE DAMAGES-RELATED TESTIMONY OF DEFENDANT INTEL’S EXPERTS 431 2/18/2021 Sealed Document filed: Defendant’s Response to Plaintiff’s Daubert Motions to EXCLUDE DAMAGES-RELATED TESTIMONY OF INTELS EXPERTS 443 2/18/2021 Sealed Document filed: VLSI’S OPPOSITION TO INTEL’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NO PRE-COMPLAINT DAMAGES UNDER 35 U.S.C.… [read post]
14 Mar 2021, 9:41 am by Eugene Volokh
The defendants' (with the plaintiff's support) seek to file under seal, exhibits A through G of their motion to enforce a settlement agreement. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 7:05 am by Venkat Balasubramani
In this case, a New York federal judge granted a preliminary injunction against the defendant, Hayley Paige Gutman, prohibiting her from interfering with plaintiff’s use of the account, which generally gave control over the account to JLM. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 3:01 am by Dennis Crouch
Read the complaint: doe v doe  The patentee argues that the secrecy is important because of the “risk that Defendants will transfer assets or destroy evidence upon learning of Plaintiff’s identity and patent. [read post]