Search for: "Sharee Gonzales" Results 281 - 300 of 338
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2014, 11:11 am by Rick Garnett
So, by enacting RFRA, Congress and the president responded to the Court’s invitation and specifically invited – indeed, required – what the Justices (without dissent) called in Gonzales v. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 10:24 am
Also, though the conventional wisdom of the pols and the media has anointed Goldsmith a hero for having stood up to the brutish David Addington, to Gonzales, to Jim Haynes and to other Executive Branch criminals in 2003-2004, I suspected that there were places in his book where Goldsmith had dissembled, there expressly were places where he was maintaining the secrecy that had led this country into further disasters, he admitted in the book to having lied outright to a New York Times… [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 4:00 am by Devlin Hartline
Golan I & II A year after the Court decided Eldred, another district court, in what would turn out to be the first step in a protracted journey back to the Supreme Court, was asked to apply the “traditional contours” test. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 8:45 pm
The Falcon program overrides these concerns by streamlining the information-sharing processes and setting up a chain-of-command structure that radiates from the Justice Department. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 6:14 pm
The Falcon program overrides these concerns by streamlining the information-sharing processes and setting up a chain-of-command structure that radiates from the Justice Department. [read post]
28 May 2006, 5:00 pm
Bruce MacEwen and Ken Lammers share two powerful images here and here. [read post]
20 Aug 2021, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal As Population Grows, So Does Debate on How to Reach Latino Voters in ’22 Midterms MSN – Stephanie Akin and Suzanne Monyak (Roll Call) | Published: 8/18/2021 Democrats know that, overall, the party does better with Latino voters than Republicans, but there is more recognition that the Hispanic electorate is far from monolithic, and outreach needs to start much earlier. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 6:15 am
It explained that Congress did not intend to include shared past experiences of violent organized crime when it created the “particular social group” basis for relief. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 6:15 am
It explained that Congress did not intend to include shared past experiences of violent organized crime when it created the “particular social group” basis for relief. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 7:24 am
Shemaria (2000) 85 Cal.App.4th 891, 894, citing rule 2–200 [fee sharing].) [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 4:00 am by Bob Bauer
Not all participants need a formal claim to share in the final decision-making; some may be included because they bring useful expertise or experience. [read post]
1 Jan 2015, 9:20 am by Lucy Reed
Resolution have questioned whether there is “genuine demand” for more openness - which rather makes one wonder where precisely they have been burying their heads for the last several years : as far as I can see there is a rather loud clamour for greater openness, but it is also clearly a view which is unanimously shared by lawyers or childrens’ groups. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 9:35 am by Ronald Collins
I see that the lion’s share of cases in more recent times involves the Court’s jurisdiction and questions of statutory interpretation. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 2:08 pm by Donna Coker
Academics Speak Out About VAWA ReauthorizationVAWA Is Not Enough:    Academics Speak Out About VAWA Caroline Bettinger-Lopez, Donna Coker, Julie Goldscheid, Leigh Goodmark, Valli Kalei Kanuha, James Ptacek, Deborah Weissman  The VAWA reauthorization bill would extend funding for important services; provide additional protections for victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, and stalking; and would ensure that tribal courts have jurisdiction over domestic… [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 4:20 pm
City of Hialeah (Santeria plaintiffs seeking to engage in animal sacrifice); Gonzales v. [read post]
9 May 2019, 1:00 pm by Kevin LaCroix
 To require Defendant to pay insurance proceeds for the replacement of medical marijuana plants would be contrary to federal law and public policy, as reflected in the CSA, Gonzales [a U.S. [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 6:04 am
Not only is the Court’s reading of the document correct, and in any case certainly well within the bounds of its role as fact finder, but it is a reading shared by the Bar in general and KPMG’s counsel in particular. [read post]