Search for: "Sharp v. E " Results 281 - 300 of 663
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Dec 2016, 1:00 pm
Eleonora Rosati discusses the VAT Directive comprising the equal treatment for both printed and electronic publications and its implications on digital exhaustion matters.Negative decision for anti-HIV therapy patent: Merck Sharpe & Dohme v Shionogi Co LimitedGuest Kat Eibhlin Vardy recaps Merck Sharp and Dohme Limited v Shionongi & Co Limited, [2016] EWHC 2989 (Pat), involving the alleged infringement of Shionogi’s European Patent, entitled… [read post]
4 Dec 2016, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Last week in the Courts On 29 and 30 November and 1 December 2016 the Court of Appeal (Macfarlane, Davis and Sharp LJJ) heard the important “serious harm” appeal in the case of Lachaux v Independent Print. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 12:25 am by INFORRM
On the same day the oral renewal of the application for permission to appeal in the case of Weston v Bates was refused by Sharp LJ. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 7:04 am
 When should this "actual v abstract" test take place and on the basis of what criteria? [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 5:13 am
As the Delhi High Court found in Naz Foundation v Government of NCT of India (“Naz Foundation”), the criminalisation of same-sex sexual conduct, even where not enforced, serve to ‘entrenc[h] stigma and encourag[e] discrimination in different spheres of life’, exposing India’s LGBTQ community to ‘harassment, blackmail, extortion and discrimination’ (Naz Foundation at [50]). [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 5:13 am
As the Delhi High Court found in Naz Foundation v Government of NCT of India (“Naz Foundation”), the criminalisation of same-sex sexual conduct, even where not enforced, serve to ‘entrenc[h] stigma and encourag[e] discrimination in different spheres of life’, exposing India’s LGBTQ community to ‘harassment, blackmail, extortion and discrimination’ (Naz Foundation at [50]). [read post]
30 Oct 2016, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
On the same day Sharp LJ refused the application for permission to appeal in the case of Theedom v Nourish Training. [read post]
3 Sep 2016, 4:17 am by David Post
For a guy who cultivates an aura of being surrounded by sharp, can-do types who can get things done, it’s a little disheartening – first we find out his personal doctor writes prose like a 15-year old, and now his lawyers put this out. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 11:21 am by Amy Howe
Second Amendment scholar Adam Winkler cautions gun-control groups, for example, that even a Supreme Court with a liberal majority is not likely to overturn District of Columbia v. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 11:16 am by Kirk Jenkins
“[W]e trust that the constitutional confines of article XIV, section 3, are sufficiently broad to encompass more than one potential redistricting scheme. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
Teaching academic, author of acclaimed defamation law textbooks, leading media law barrister in Australia and the UK, Dr Matt Collins QC packs a lot into his day … He agreed to spare some of his time to discuss defamation, privacy, celebrity, journalists’ sources, and free speech, just for starters GLJ: I wanted to start by asking you what you see as the major flaws in Australian defamation law, and how you might go about correcting them. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 3:19 am
The horror comes not merely from the subject of the listing but from its banality, the reduction of its components to ritualized actions whose principle interest in in its aggregation ("In Italia seicento e quaranta; In Alemagna duecento e trentuna; Cento in Francia, in Turchia novantuna; Ma in Ispagna son già mille e tre"), without regard to rank, value or societal impact ("E v'han donne d'ogni grado, D'ogni forma,… [read post]