Search for: "Sharpe v. Department of Justice"
Results 281 - 300
of 515
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2016, 2:49 pm
” In last year’s decision in United States v. [read post]
25 May 2016, 12:44 pm
Department of Justice and the larger law enforcement and regulatory apparatus of the United States government. [read post]
23 Apr 2016, 3:56 am
A study by the National Institute of Justice found that most departments had written policies governing pursuits. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 5:37 pm
A few sharp legal observers have suggested, in advance, that in one pending case, Welch v. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 4:00 am
Blood Tribe Department of Health, [2008] 2 SCR 574 R. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 4:26 pm
John Reed Stark Many of us have been following the continuing battle between Apple and the U.S. government on whether the government can required the company to unlock the iPhone of the San Bernardino terrorist, Syed Rizwan Farook, with a combination of confusion and concern. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 7:05 am
Lewis v. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 7:31 am
Department of Justice, which complained the release could make it easier to launder money, including for terrorism, and discourage cooperation with law enforcement. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 11:48 am
* UK's Creative Industries - EconomicsNicola sinks her paws into the delicious 2015 update of the UK's creative industries' contribution to the economy, which the UK Government's Department for Culture, Media & Sport (DCMS) has just published.* Storm in a C Cup: Mr Justice Carr refuses injunction and account of profits in Stretchline v H&M spatElettra Bietti (A&O) summarises for the Kat-readership the recent and unreported decision of… [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 4:00 am
But with one exception, the case law on the admissibility of electronic records and electronic discovery ignores them; see: R. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 5:05 pm
John Reed Stark David Fontaine In this day and age, the members of the boards of directors of most companies understand that cybersecurity issues are both important and should be a board-level priority. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 8:49 am
Second, the claims are ineligible for patent protection under the Supreme Court’s 2014 decision in Alice v. [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 4:17 pm
On the same day the application for permission to appeal in the case of Lachaux v Independent Print (and the two other linked Lachaux cases) was referred to a Lord/Lady Justice for a decision on the papers. [read post]
22 Nov 2015, 9:01 pm
” Glatt offered no sharp line litmus test. [read post]
8 Nov 2015, 11:19 am
Although it is a close call, the decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Schrems v. [read post]
6 Sep 2015, 4:43 am
Very sharp spikes. [read post]
30 Aug 2015, 9:30 pm
Brown v. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 5:30 am
Chief Justice Roberts’ King v. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 1:54 pm
Lady Justice Sharp, following the lead of Castle, dismissed that argument on the basis that it would be wrong for section 11 to change “the nature or scope of the functions to which it relates”. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am
On November 14, 2014, in Priests for Life v. [read post]
