Search for: "Short v. Miller"
Results 281 - 300
of 950
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm
In short, an attorney or lawfirm can avoid being sued by the client through an arbitration clause in the attorney-client agreement that covers all possible future disputes with one exception: it preserves the firm's right to sue the client to recover its costs (and by extension, its fees), which is the only plausible claim that the law firm could have against a client. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 6:00 am
In Attard Industries Inc. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 7:18 am
(Justice Ginsburg’s dissent was short and less important. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 6:56 am
By Ronald Miller, J.D. [read post]
21 May 2015, 4:13 pm
On February 28, 2015, the M/V ST. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm
But in a recent ruling, in Sessions v. [read post]
2 May 2007, 9:20 am
In Charter One Mortgage Corp. v. [read post]
29 May 2015, 5:57 am
Jerad and Amanda Miller were losers. [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 7:34 am
In Rivera Rivas v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 10:22 am
Tomlinson v. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 11:06 am
State v. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 3:07 pm
See Miller v. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 9:18 am
Agency v. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 6:18 am
By Ronald Miller, J.D. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 8:04 am
The short answer: no. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 7:01 am
By Ronald Miller, J.D. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 7:04 am
By Ronald Miller, J.D. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 5:00 am
Read the full Employer Law Report post and a copy of the court’s decision in Miller v. [read post]
25 Nov 2016, 6:10 am
Special Preview: Lord Millett on Prerogative Power and Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty As mentioned above, Volume 7 of the Yearbook includes a short article written by Lord Millett concerning the upcoming Article 50/Brexit appeal (Miller v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union). [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 11:23 am
President Thomas V. [read post]
