Search for: "Simpson v. Grant"
Results 281 - 300
of 350
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2010, 7:35 am
"); Simpson v. [read post]
6 May 2009, 1:22 am
Simpson Thacher currently has no U.K. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 4:30 am
Part I – Spicy IP), India: Discussion of grant of Indian patents to Cipla for Fosamax derivative and Nexium derivative: (Spicy IP), India: Draft National Biotechnology Regulatory Authority Bill: (Spicy IP), Ivory Coast: Ivorians increasingly choose fake medicines on price: (Afro-IP), Mexico: New Mexican medicaments approvals regime: an early report: (IP tango), UK: Leave to appeal refused in trade mark infringement proceedings between Eli Lilly and 8PM Chemist concerning the… [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 4:00 pm
The plaintiff must in addition show that the owner had an “expectation and willingness” that the vehicle would be driven by B: see Simpson v. [read post]
3 Apr 2016, 4:23 pm
The appeal in the case of Simpson v Mirror Group is floating on 24 and 25 May 2016. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 6:05 am
” DC Comics, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2024, 11:54 pm
The Bottom Line While the Ninth Circuit has touted the value of expert witnesses in several of its recent (albeit unpublished) opinions, Yonay v. [read post]
26 Jun 2016, 4:05 pm
Malawi Oswald Lutepo – serving 11 years in prison after being convicted of conspiracy to defraud – is bringing a libel action against the Sunday Times over a claim that he was granted conjugal rights and had sexual intercourse with a woman believed to be his wife. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 7:37 pm
(Re)Emerging Issues The Seattle/Louisville Decision and the Future of Race-Conscious Programs Philip Tegeler Separate ≠ Equal: Mexican Americans Before Brown v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 6:35 am
But, assuming that it was open to me to refuse to hear Miss Watts or to grant the motion irrespective of its merits, I decided that it was entirely inappropriate for me to do so andto the extent that my hearing Miss Watts required me to exercise my powers under rule 2.1, I did so. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Simpson, No. 07-5840 A sentence and order of restitution imposed for defendant's crime of mail fraud, involving his underreporting of payroll information for his businesses to his workers' compensation insurance carriers, is affirmed where the district court correctly concluded that the "loss" caused by this conduct was the amount of additional premiums that the insurance carriers would have charged had they been given accurate information. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 9:03 am
OJ Simpson: faced forced transfer of his IP, including his book, released under a cover that looked like it said “I Did It” instead of “If I Did It”Reed v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 5:19 pm
Gaughan v. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Bostock v. [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 1:14 pm
From Bey-Cousin v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:34 am
That Homer Simpson might be confused is irrelevant. [read post]
30 May 2016, 1:52 am
On 24 May 2016 the Court of Appeal (Laws, King and Lindblom LJJ) heard the appeal in the case of Simpson v Mirror Group Newspapers. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:59 am
Funk v. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 1:32 am
In U.S. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 5:59 pm
(dissenting) in Grant v. [read post]
