Search for: "Smart v. United States" Results 281 - 300 of 1,230
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Sep 2010, 8:30 pm by Ben Sheffner
United States, 473 U.S. 207 (1985), that the National Stolen Property Act, 18 U. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 11:52 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
In light of the decision in Loving et al v Commissioner where the court ruled that the Internal Revenue Service did not have the authority to regulate tax preparers, the IRS has issued the following statement: As of Friday, Jan. 18, 2013, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia has enjoined the Internal Revenue Service from enforcing the regulatory requirements for registered tax return preparers. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 6:51 am by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
Boston Bomber Co-Defendant Loses Claim Voir Dire Questioning Was Inadequate In United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 9:08 am by Joel Graczyk
Like the legal profession generally, the United States Supreme Court has a reputation as slow to embrace new technologies. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 12:57 pm by Eric Goldman
Harleysville Insurance * It May be Best to Shut Down Your Facebook Account While You are on Probation — State v. [read post]
23 Dec 2018, 7:53 am by Wolfgang Demino
Judicial NoticeDefendants request that the Court take judicial notice of documents that were filed in various collection lawsuits filed in King County Superior Court and in litigation in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. [read post]
18 Aug 2021, 3:30 am by Liz Dunshee
There are some unique facts here, but in insider trading lingo, trading based on confidential info from an employer looks a lot like “misappropriation” – which the Supreme Court upheld as a theory of liability in 1997, in United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 8:41 pm
United States, Colorado officials have no duty to enforce the federal law--unless they volunteer to do so, either on their own or in exchange for federal dollars. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 5:15 am
  United States law uses the exclusionary ruleto enforce the requirements of the 4th Amendment, which means evidence obtained by actions that violate the 4th Amendment cannot be used against the person whose property was searched in a criminal prosecution unless. . . . [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 6:16 am by SHG
At The Watch, Radley Balko dissects the Seventh Circuit’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 9:25 pm by Josh Blackman
REUVENI: The United States thinks Your Honor can be fair and impartial. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 9:06 am by Jason Rantanen
  On August 15, 2019, Time Warner filed a petition with the United States Supreme Court seeking to vacate a $139.8 million damages verdict. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 9:16 am by Arthur Bright
The United States Supreme Court is, when it comes to technology, almost completely ignorant. [read post]