Search for: "Smith v. Deem" Results 281 - 300 of 1,055
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2020, 5:03 pm by Jamie Markham
The court also distinguished the conditional discharge at issue in Smith from a PJC, which the North Carolina Court of Appeals deemed to be a conviction barring issuance of a firearm permit in Friend v. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 5:48 am by Joel R. Brandes
Many states allow for such a change to occur with ease on the marriage license, but New York did not.Laws of 2019, Ch 712 enacted and effective on December 20, 2019, amended Domestic Relations Law §11-a, subd. 1 a to allow the New York City clerk to designate additional staff members as he or she deems necessary to officiate marriages.Laws of 2019, Ch 663, enacted on December 12, 2019, effective 90 days after it becomes a law, amended Family Court Act § 812, subd. 5, and Criminal… [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:00 pm
This Client Advisory, originally distributed in December 2019, highlights important developments in the law governing employee benefit plans and executive compensation over the past year. [read post]
20 Oct 2019, 9:11 am by Steve Kalar
Before any witness testified, the district court deemed the prior admissible. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:28 am by Carolina Attorneys
“Unless a contrary intent is clear, the word ‘custody’ shall be deemed to include custody or visitation or both. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
Smith v Obuck, 2019 ABQB 593 [351] The Plaintiff’s misrepresentations made to get on CWD cast a shadow on his credibility. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 1:26 pm by Bill Marler
Thanks to the New York Times and Matt Richtel for “Tainted Pork, Ill Consumers and an Investigation Thwarted. [read post]
3 Aug 2019, 9:35 am by Eric Goldman
Ozimals * 17 USC 512(f) Claim Against “Twilight” Studio Survives Motion to Dismiss–Smith v. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 4:23 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
This claim and ensuing damages sought for the breach are duplicative of the malpractice cause of action (see Alphas v Smith, 147 AD3d 557, 558-559 [1st Dept 2017] [where the court found that the relief sought in the fiduciary duty claim was identical to the legal malpractice claim as it sought similar damages]). [read post]