Search for: "Smith v. Sharp"
Results 281 - 300
of 318
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2010, 1:20 pm
In today’s case (Dhah v. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 11:51 pm
Reed Smith Sees Profits Rise as Revenue Dips The American Lawyer Reed Smith reached the $1 million profits per equity partner mark in 2009 with a 7 percent increase. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 3:23 am
: Catnic Components Ltd & Anor v Hill and Smith Ltd (Spicy IP) United States US Patents BPAI rules for ex parte appeals: Request for comment and notice of roundtable (Patently-O) Bilski and Warsaw share insights (AwakenIP) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: False marking statute applies on a per article basis: Forest Group, Inc v Bon Tool Co (GRAY On Claims) (EPLAW) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) You say tomato... [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 3:26 am
"It was error to dismiss the first cause of action merely because plaintiff is not entitled to the declaration he seeks (see Lanza v Wagner, 11 NY2d 317, 334 [1962], cert denied 371 US 901 [1962]); the proper course is to declare in favor of defendants (see Holliswood Care Ctr. v Whalen, 58 NY2d 1001, 1004 [1983]; Mongelli v Sharp, 140 AD2d 273 [1988]). [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 8:37 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 8:38 pm
In today's case, (KT v. [read post]
27 Nov 2009, 6:26 am
Defendant had no privacy interest in his records as a mere cellphone subscribers under Smith v. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 7:42 am
Smith, which was argued in October. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 6:04 am
Smith, which was argued in October.... [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 9:17 am
Sharp v. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 6:25 am
(IP Dragon) Colombia Legal victory for Coca Cola over trade mark (IP tango) Denmark Danish Supreme Court affirms decision forcing food stall operator using ORIENTEXPRESSEN to change her trade mark (Class 46) Europe Questions on acquiescence for ECJ in Budejovicky Budvar Narodni Podnik v Anheuser-Busch Inc (Class 46) (IPKat) EWHC questions referred to ECJ in L'Oréal SA v eBay now available on Curia (Class 46) Disruptive innovations:… [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
Or on life support, at least - MEI v JCM American Corp stayed pending outcome of Mars v Coin Acceptors (Property, intangible) O2 Micro - ITC judge grants in part O2's motion for summary determination of importa [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
Or on life support, at least - MEI v JCM American Corp stayed pending outcome of Mars v Coin Acceptors (Property, intangible) O2 Micro - ITC judge grants in part O2's motion for summary determination of importa [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 8:48 am
Additionally, the California Supreme Court addressed this very issue in Smith v. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 5:30 pm
Farasy on LEED v. [read post]
18 Jul 2009, 7:31 am
This post is by my colleagues Mark Schonfeld, John Sturc, Barry Goldsmith, Eric Creizman, Jennifer Colgan Halter, Akita St. [read post]
8 May 2009, 10:08 am
Sharps v. [read post]
12 Apr 2009, 5:56 am
See United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 4:15 am
"The Constitution, said the court, which protects "vehement, caustic and sometimes unpleasantly sharp attacks" in a political context, does not insist on complete verbal precision.Justice Smith then explained:"In this, the Constitution follows the common law of libel which, as the United States Supreme Court has observed, ‘overlooks minor inaccuracies and concentrates upon substantial truth' (Masson v… [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 7:00 am
See Smith v. [read post]
