Search for: "Smith v. U.S. Government (Department of Justice)"
Results 281 - 300
of 633
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Dec 2022, 5:01 am
Would fighting climate change finally become a priority for the U.S. government? [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 8:51 am
Scott Smith, Howard Marshall and David Resch, three top cybersecurity experts at the FBI are leaving the government, reports the Journal. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 7:19 am
HHS argued that the RFRA was intended to restore the state of the law as it existed before Employment Division, Dept. of Human Resources of Oregon v Smith, 494 U.S. 872 (1990). [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 6:34 am
Zuress and Weatherill presented the question whether “dual-status technicians” who perform civilian roles within military departments may sue the government for employment discrimination under Title VII; Witt relatedly asked the Court to overrule Feres v. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 4:26 pm
Additionally, the Department of Justice argues that under the current law, messages are unprotected if they are opened, read, or in the trash or drafts folder. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 8:22 am
The firm eventually became Farr & Taranto when Smith left for Jenner & Block and Joel Klein left for the Department of Justice. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 9:01 am
Rejection of Nixon Precedent The court addressed the government’s reliance on a statement in United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 9:01 am
Rejection of Nixon Precedent The court addressed the government’s reliance on a statement in United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 9:01 am
Rejection of Nixon Precedent The court addressed the government’s reliance on a statement in United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 4:42 pm
In Doe v. [read post]
8 Sep 2007, 6:07 am
Smith & Wesson. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 12:28 pm
Priscilla (Cilla) Smith is a Senior Fellow and Reproductive Justice Program Director at the Information Society Project at the Yale Law School. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 12:40 pm
United States, 09-11328, and Smith v. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 5:25 pm
And in the recent Fourth Department decision, People v. [read post]
24 May 2018, 9:01 pm
The Department of Justice has said no. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 1:32 pm
The Justice Department has now filed a notice of appeal and a motion to partially stay U.S. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 8:42 am
The Department of Justice has not, to my knowledge, ever repeated this Bork/Levi “dual filing” strategem. [read post]
12 Jun 2010, 8:45 pm
Here is a portion of what Kagan had to say in the memo:In the case, Smith v. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm
Smith and Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye v. [read post]
15 Nov 2015, 7:48 pm
(When it later moved the INS from the Department of Justice to DHS, Congress transferred this and other authorities from the Attorney General to the DHS Secretary.)When the Texas v. [read post]
