Search for: "Soule v. United States" Results 281 - 300 of 399
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2012, 1:21 pm by Eric Turkewitz
This is the heart and soul of the decision: That premise is inconsistent with the reasoning underlying the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in Lawrence v Texas (539 US 558 [2003]), in which the Court held that laws criminalizing homosexual conduct violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution (id. at 578). [read post]
27 May 2012, 10:31 pm by Leland E. Beck
The Supreme Court of the United States unanimously took Congress at its word last week. [read post]
11 May 2012, 4:20 am by SHG
When Eastern District of New York Judge John Gleeson used his sentencing memo in U.S. v. [read post]
6 May 2012, 2:29 pm by Sam Murrant
Peart v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 568 Court ignored key factors in “foreign criminal” deportation case. [read post]
2 May 2012, 6:29 am
According to some authorities, "SOS" stands for "save our souls" [Merpel prefers "send out sandwiches" ...]. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 7:19 am by John J. Sullivan
  It’s based on the reality that the state law claims improperly invade an area explicitly covered by a federal regulatory scheme, one that is guarded from such invasion by nothing less than the United States Constitution and its Supremacy Clause. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 8:00 am
The Virginia Non-Compete Blog, whose focus is on the protection of employees, details a recent decision, United Marketing Solutions v. [read post]
25 Feb 2012, 6:31 am
With the passage of time the number of sick industrial units increased rapidly. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 6:01 am by Frank Pasquale
” By any measure, the United States is a constitutional republic in name only. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 9:04 pm by Frank Pasquale
” By any measure, the United States is a constitutional republic in name only. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 5:17 am by Nicholas J. Wagoner
The ATS provides that “district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any civil action by an alien for a tort only, committed in violation of the law of nations or a treaty of the United States. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 2:18 am by admin
Supreme Court stated in its 2010 Citizens United v. [read post]