Search for: "Stack v. Stack"
Results 281 - 300
of 2,016
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2019, 7:57 am
22 Jul 2010, 5:29 am
Sackett v. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 4:50 am
Aside from the normal, every-day problem of attorney fees in litigation and how they tend to stack up, in Quadracci v Klein 2019 NY Slip Op 33837(U) December 24, 2019 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 650913/2016 Judge: Nancy M. [read post]
28 May 2007, 3:54 pm
Prompted by Family Lore on Stack v Dowden, this is a much delayed look at relationship breakdown and joint tenancies. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 7:57 am
It probably won't quite stack up with the drama of the Patriots v. [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 5:00 am
See Phillips v. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 9:16 pm
It’s like gambling in Vegas; the house is stacked against you. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 10:36 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 3:36 am
When determining the value to Apple of the Portfolio, the Judge first calculated the value to Apple of the Stack and then scaled this using an estimate of Optis’ share of the Stack.[4] In doing this, the Judge originally found that the Stack comprised 26,600 patent families. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 9:25 am
The case is entitled Isett et al. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 1:00 am
Most importantly, the CCA had previously noted in Moreno v. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 7:32 pm
In Capps v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 8:24 am
(My favorite case is one known to Texans in my age cohort -- Boyles v. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 4:37 am
Supreme Court properly dismissed plaintiff’s legal malpractice cause of action in the original complaint because he failed to allege that “but for” defendant’s negligent conduct, he would have prevailed in the underlying action (Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP v Fashion Boutique of Short Hills, Inc., 10 AD3d 267, 272 [1st Dept 2004]; see Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438, 442 [2007]). [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 4:25 am
In the case of Devincenzo-Gambone v. [read post]
6 Sep 2021, 9:15 am
Pursuant to appeal of that decision, however, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has now addressed the photonegative question in HTC Corp. et al. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 2:02 pm
[mitchellepner] * Thoughts on Kitchen v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 5:22 am
The case does not make new law, relying as it does on the House of Lords' test in Stack v Dowden, yet two judges in the lower courts and one Lord Justice in the Court of Appeal, applying that test, considered that the respondent was entitled to a 90% share in the property. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 4:52 am
That is one of the lessons in Markov v Barrows 2022 NY Slip Op 04780 [208 AD3d 401] August 2, 2022 Appellate Division, First Department. [read post]
