Search for: "Standard Jury Instructions Criminal Cases" Results 281 - 300 of 1,705
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2007, 8:03 am
In the state case, the Supreme Court ruled that the Court of Criminal Appeals wrongly put up a new legal barrier to a death row inmate's challenge to jury instructions in his sentencing. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 6:09 am by Jonathan Holbrook
As always, these summaries will be added to Smith’s Criminal Case Compendium, a free and searchable database of case summaries from 2008 to present. [read post]
20 Apr 2021, 9:59 am by Patrick Barone
According to the standard jury instructions utilized in Michigan sex crimes cases it is up to the jury to judge and weigh a witness’s credibility. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 12:32 pm by Richard Hornsby
Specifically, beginning in 1981, the Florida Supreme Court began adopting and publishing Standard Jury Instructions that were to be used in all all criminal cases. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 7:17 am by Alex Phipps
These summaries will be added to Smith’s Criminal Case Compendium, a free and searchable database of case summaries from 2008 to the present. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 3:48 am
It is a concept we attempt to explain in text books, classroom lectures and discussions, opening statements, closing arguments and jury instructions. [read post]
Additionally, the ruling stated that the court must instruct the jury that in order to find the defendant guilty, it must determine that he knew he was prohibited from possessing weapons at the time of the offense. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 6:47 am by Phil Dixon
The reasonableness of a defendant’s belief of threat is judged by an objective standard. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 10:09 pm
The court later instructed the jury that it could infer that the nephew's testimony would have been incriminating. [read post]
3 May 2022, 11:34 am by Robert Liles
  Additionally, it held that the district court properly instructed the jury on the correct criminal standard for violations of the Controlled Substances Act. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 8:34 am by Jonathan Holbrook
As always, these summaries will be added to Smith’s Criminal Case Compendium, a free and searchable database of case summaries from 2008 to present. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 5:31 am by Andrew Delaney
This was particularly the case given that petitioner had refused to submit to testing at the time of trial, which resulted in an instruction that the jury could consider his refusal as evidence of guilt. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 8:07 pm by Jamie Markham
The Supreme Court rejected the defendant’s argument that the trial court’s refusal to instruct the jury in accordance with N.C.P.I. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 9:11 am by Jon Sands
This is a 841 case revolving around a jury's assigning drug quantities to criminal conduct. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 5:31 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
It contained statutes and jury instructions. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 9:00 am by Robichaud
 Yes, juries are instructed to abide to this fundamental maxim as the only way a person is granted a fair trial. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 8:02 am
Suffice to say that viewing what juries do in actual cases will give us a much better understanding of jury behavior and provide valuable information for different techniques in presenting evidence, instructing juries and jury management. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 11:32 am
Dreis & Krump Mfg., 67 N.Y.2d 328, 337, 502 N.Y.S.2d 696, 701, 493 N.E.2d 920, 925 (1986) (noting that industry standards are not dispositive in a negligence action and that the jury should have been instructed to consider industry standards along with all other evidence presented). [read post]
19 Jul 2014, 5:12 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In spite of the argument advanced by the opponent, the criminalhttp://criminaldefense.1800nynylaw.com/new-york-criminal-lawyer.html court cannot conceive how the prosecutor's instructions could rationally be construed as curative. [read post]
25 May 2010, 8:19 pm by Anna Christensen
  At issue in the case was whether the Second Circuit’s plain-error standard of review for ex post facto violations was consistent with the Court’s interpretation of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 52(b). [read post]