Search for: "State v. King" Results 281 - 300 of 6,124
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Sep 2016, 9:37 am by Earl Drott
” Unfortunately for those injured by modern-day governments, the doctrine of sovereign immunity is still alive and well in the United States, even though our country has not been under the ostensible power of a king for centuries. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 10:00 am by Dan Ernst
His play King Henry V is a sustained and powerful meditation on the interrelationships of all three. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 7:35 pm by Abbe Gluck
I have a new piece at Politico that follows up on the federalism arguments in King v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 8:47 am by Eric Citron
  He seemed to realize that state legislators would be in an impossible position under that reading – more or less forced to “adopt” or “endorse” the ACA system in order to avoid unmanageable consequences in their states. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 7:34 pm by Gerard N. Magliocca
My eyes opened as wide as saucers, though, when I saw "Corfield v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 12:29 pm
It is, in reality, regulation, and Congress lacks a power to require the states to set up the exchanges. [read post]
17 May 2011, 10:40 am by utahdefenders
King as is likely to go down in history as another Supreme Court case which makes everyone less free and the state police power even more powerful. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 5:08 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Briefs: Federal Opening Brief.pdfDownload State of Alaska Opening Brief.pdfDownload Enviros Answer Brief.pdfDownload Federal Reply.pdfDownload State of Alaska Reply.pdfDownload King Cove Reply.pdfDownload City of Cold Bay and that dangerous airport [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 10:09 pm
This is the "incorporation" question, and it's raised in Nordyke v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 10:59 am
Shortly thereafter, in a different case, the state supreme court answers the question. [read post]
22 Nov 2014, 5:03 am by Lyle Denniston
  The state noted it is willing to have its case, if granted, put on the same briefing schedule as King v. [read post]