Search for: "State Board of Equalization v. Superior Court"
Results 281 - 300
of 396
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Sep 2013, 11:25 am
Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action, which is now before the United States Supreme Court, illustrates all the treacherous crosscurrents in modern equal protection law. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
Supreme Court in Decker v. [read post]
9 May 2013, 1:48 am
With the rapid changes in technology and a myriad of regulatory frameworks that may be applicable, employee handbooks may need to be updated much more frequently than ever – especially with respect to the rapidly evolving world of social media: Savvy employers, especially those with multi-state operations, know that employment actions are regulated at the federal, state and even local level. [read post]
9 May 2013, 1:48 am
With the rapid changes in technology and a myriad of regulatory frameworks that may be applicable, employee handbooks may need to be updated much more frequently than ever – especially with respect to the rapidly evolving world of social media: Savvy employers, especially those with multi-state operations, know that employment actions are regulated at the federal, state and even local level. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 4:00 am
The court addressed the disputed items and ordered the husband to pay the wife an equalization … Terasen Gas Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 9:54 am
Superior Court, 208 Cal. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 10:35 pm
Nixon, 2005 BCCA 601 (also see the Superior Court decision).In the recently released decision in Rocha v. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 2:20 pm
The court used to intervene only when the other two branches couldn’t agree on how to draw the lines for Congressional, state legislative, and state board of equalization districts. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 8:10 am
In Dunsmuir v. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 1:50 pm
Superior Court, 35 Cal. [read post]
3 Oct 2012, 4:21 pm
Map of the geographic boundaries of the various United States Courts of Appeals and United States District Courts. [read post]
27 Sep 2012, 6:34 pm
The questions were: Debtor was sued in Superior Court and a judgment was entered relating to the repayment of unemployment claims in 2010 to the Employment Development Department – State of California. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 5:14 pm
The suit was dismissed by the Maricopa County Superior Court and the Colemans appealed. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 5:39 pm
In Paratransit, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 2:00 am
State Board of Equalization 152 Cal. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 2:00 am
State Board of Equalization 152 Cal. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 6:52 am
The Court said what it meant and meant what is said in CCH v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 11:43 am
There, the Court held that nuclear whistleblowers were not protected when they raised safety concerns to their superiors. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 10:40 am
The Appellate Division of the New Jersey Superior Court, in Zehl v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 3:35 am
Board of Education, used the arguments he developed for Mendez v. [read post]