Search for: "State v. Andersen"
Results 281 - 300
of 357
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Nov 2008, 6:01 am
But now, in United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 9:46 pm
Arthur Andersen, the California Supreme Court reaffirmed the state's strong policy against noncompetition agreements, rejecting the Ninth Circuit's "narrow restraint" exception. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 5:26 pm
Under the facts of this hypothetical case (stylized as McCain v. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 3:07 pm
Conference of November 7, 2008 __________________ Docket: 08-146 Title: Arthur Andersen LLP, et al. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 10:14 pm
Arthur Andersen LLP, 44 Cal.4th 937, 81 Cal.Rptr.3d 282, 293, 189 P.3d 285, 295 (2008). [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 7:39 pm
Arthur Andersen LLP, 189 P.3d. 285, 288 (2008), the Ninth Circuit stated (arguably in dicta) that noncompetition agreements in California are invalid unless necessary to protect an employer’s trade secrets. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 6:07 pm
(Stanford University)Alexis Marcus (Northwestern University)Alvarez Fernando (University of Chicago)Andersen Torben (Northwestern University)Baliga Sandeep (Northwestern University)Banerjee Abhijit V. [read post]
3 Sep 2008, 9:46 am
In a long-awaited ruling, the Court in Edwards v. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 10:39 pm
Andersen announced in June 2002 that it would cease its accounting practices in the United States. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 10:42 pm
The Opinion States: "We conclude that Andersen's noncompetition agreement was invalid. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 7:20 am
Arthur Andersen, S147190, the unanimous court held that a state statute with roots in 19th century laws gives California workers great freedom to switch jobs, to compete against old employers and to solicit former clients. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 8:47 pm
In Edwards v. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 1:43 am
In Edwards v. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 1:28 am
The Court stated that California state courts have not embraced the Ninth Circuit’s narrow restraint exception and stated “no reported California state court decision has endorsed the Ninth Circuit’s reasoning, and we are of the view that California courts have been clear in their expression that section 16660 represents a strong public policy of the state which should not be diluted by judicial fiat” (citing Scott… [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 1:00 am
" Bardin v. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 10:03 pm
In Edwards v. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 9:27 pm
Arthur Andersen, LLP will be available tomorrow, August 7, 2008 at 10:00 a.m. on the Court’s website. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 4:48 pm
Andersen and Capitol v. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 10:00 am
"North Carolina court to take a "fresh look" at the NC State "John Doe" cases, issues stay of subpoena to NC State in Elektra v. [read post]
