Search for: "State v. Back"
Results 281 - 300
of 46,003
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Dec 2022, 8:56 am
The Supreme Court’s cert grant last June in Moore v. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 6:22 am
Hours ago, I was skeptical of the legal claims in Anderson v. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 4:34 pm
Hamdan v. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 9:07 pm
Beyond Pesticides, the Center for Food Safety (CFS), and others are doing victory dances this week after back-to-back court wins. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 9:12 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 9:12 am
United States, 320 U.S. 81 (1943). [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 1:30 am
In EU (Afghanistan), the appeals in KA came back ostensibly for determination on their facts applying the principles set out in KA. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 6:27 am
And in United States v. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 12:03 am
This symposium contribution goes back farther, locating the IAC doctrine’s origins in a series of state cases from... [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 9:58 am
In Derringer v. [read post]
21 May 2008, 1:31 am
" Citing Selkin v Regan, 120 AD2d 204, where the Appellate Division ruled that an individual's FAS "consists of income actually earned during the subject year," Supreme Court said that CERS reasonably concluded that "the majority of the lump sum back pay that Mr. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 10:23 am
This gives us a chance to reach back a bit and look a little decision with a big (unwritten) sub-context: United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 8:25 am
Hood v. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 1:00 am
Miramon v. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 5:30 am
United States v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 3:57 pm
Bunnell v. [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 7:33 am
Allman v. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 1:08 pm
In a one-two punch illustrating the continuing vigor of the presumption against extraterritoriality, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, on consecutive days last week, issued important decisions applying Morrison v. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 9:23 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 May 2014, 4:34 am
Circuit Judge Christopher Charles Piazza's 13-page opinion in Wright v Arkansas held that the state law ban, arising from a voter-approved constitutional amendment back in 2004, was:an unconstitutional attempt to narrow the definition of equality. [read post]
