Search for: "State v. Back" Results 281 - 300 of 46,003
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2024, 5:57 am by Steven Cohen
  The plaintiff states that felt a pop in his lower back/hip when he picked up a lock line. [read post]
8 May 2024, 4:26 am by jonathanturley
In comparison, Daniels may be the only authentic part of the entire case in New York v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 1:11 pm by Evan Brown
This flawed scope suggests no direct link between the law’s restrictions and the stated security concerns, weakening its justification under strict scrutiny. [read post]
7 May 2024, 1:11 pm by Evan Brown
This flawed scope suggests no direct link between the law’s restrictions and the stated security concerns, weakening its justification under strict scrutiny. [read post]
7 May 2024, 9:32 am by vforberger
Note: The 40% administrative penalty is actually two separate penalties: a 15% penalty that goes back into the unemployment trust fund and a 25% penalty that goes into a separate program integrity fund. [read post]
Starbucks (10(j) Relief Standard):  On April 23, 2024, oral argument before the United States Supreme Court took place in Starbucks Corp. v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
The FTC goes on to allege that Tapestry “intends to raise prices for Michael Kors through reducing discounts and promotions and pulling back on wholesale. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:20 am by Eugene Volokh
This appears to be a known sort of deindexing trick, which I discussed at pp. 300-01 of my Shenanigans (Internet Takedown Edition) piece, and which has been known as far back as 2016, see this Tim Cushing (TechDirt) piece, and likely even earlier. [read post]