Search for: "State v. Bail" Results 281 - 300 of 1,715
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2016, 12:00 am by Giesela Ruehl
In this context, he discusses two recent cases, Goldman Sachs International v Novo Banco SA [2015] EWHC 2371 (Comm), and BayernLB v Hypo Alpe Adria (HETA case) Regional Court, Munich I, judgment of 8 May 2015, that have dealt with the recognition of foreign resolution acts. [read post]
As if Michael Gove MP needed further reminding, in wake of Colin Yeo’s appearance on World at One on Wednesday where he pointed out the fundamental error of the Justice Secretary’s assertion that Britain cannot deport EEA nationals with a criminal record, the Supreme Court in R (Nouazli) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2016] UKSC 16 makes clear that EEA nationals can be deported by virtue of the Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2006,… [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 2:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
Eight Amendment Ban on Cruel and Unusual Punishment The Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution states: “Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 5:00 am by Jed Rubenfeld
In Flagg Bros., the court found that a New York statute authorizing a warehouseman’s sale of bailed goods under certain conditions didn’t make such a sale state action. [read post]
31 May 2011, 6:19 pm by JT
NYU-Hospital for Joint Diseases v American Intl. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 6:21 am
Teesta Atul Setalvad v State of Gujarat may well be a test case to decide whether the State's eagerness for custodial interrogation of an accused has to be given primacy over the accused's civil liberties. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 1:53 pm
The Spencer v Hartford case is flying silently under the radar and PR of NSSTA and all but a few blogs. [read post]