Search for: "State v. Barks" Results 281 - 300 of 381
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2014, 3:30 pm by Wells Bennett
New York (state legislatures cannot set maximum hours in particular industries); and Korematsu v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 9:05 am by Arthur F. Coon
AB 1307 is aimed at correcting to some extent problems with CEQA that were highlighted by the recent appellate decision in Make UC a Good Neighbor v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 6:26 am by David Hart QC
Instead of deciding that there should be a statutory compensation scheme backed by the state (as per a very limited English version) , the law decided that pleural plaques amounted to bodily injury. [read post]
17 Sep 2012, 4:42 am by Susan Brenner
Heeb's stated results support his overarching conclusion, namely that skill predominates over chance in poker. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 6:28 pm
It had its legal beginning in 1896, when the Supreme Court rendered a decision known as the Plessy v. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
In both swing states and safe seats, Republicans say liberals hate them personally and may turn rioters or a police state on people who disobey them. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
Research and Resources Why keep a dog and bark yourself? [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 1:32 am by Lucy Hayes, Olswang LLP
In the recent rulings of McGraddie v McGraddie [2013] UKSC 58 and Henderson v Foxworth Investments Ltd [2014] UKSC 41 the Supreme Court overturned an appellate court for interfering with a trial judge’s findings of fact. [read post]